Forum Topics

Covid, Sweden and the Myth of Herd Immunity.

I see that Michael Brown, our resident Holocaust/Twin Towers/Covid Denier, has taken to posting vague, unattributed charts, entirely out-of-context, to try to "prove" his claim that Sweden didn't have a lockdown, and so had far fewer deaths.This is a complete lie.1. While Sweden didn't impose a total national lockdown, it did take some measures, such as closing schools and universities and banning gatherings of more than 50 etc. Meanwhile, local authorities imposed further restrictions. More generally, Swedes themselves voluntarily self-isolated and practised enhanced hygiene measures as "good citizens" in a popular social democracy. Further, as a highly developed country, they readily embraced Work From Home, and as analysis of real-time credit card use and travel passes showed, greatly reduced their travel and shopping.2. Nonetheless, despite the above and the fact that they have a highly developed health service, however you measure it, they have some of the worst death rates in the developed world, CONSIDERABLY worse than their Nordic neighbours.For example, the current number of Covid Deaths per Million of Population is as follows:United Kingdom - 672SWEDEN - 577France - 515Denmark - 122Finland - 64Norway - 52https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deaths-worldwide-per-million-inhabitants/3. There are emerging any number of authoritative studies, incl from Sweden itself, which show that their approach has been pretty disastrous, eg:https://time.com/5899432/sweden-coronovirus-disaster/https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/how-finland-kept-covid-19-in-check-and-protected-its-economy-1.4364512https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/28/facebook-posts/sweden-mostly-open-has-higher-covid-19-death-rate-/(Of course all the above pre-supposes that you you take 5 minutes to google the subject with an open mind - a process clearly alien to nutjob conspiracy theorists like Brown, who are entirely impervious to reason, facts, evidence or indeed basic honesty should such concepts challenge their pre-conceived obsessions.)3. "Herd Immunity" in the context of Covid is a myth, which has not happened, indeed cannot happen.For as Sarah Pitt, Fellow of the Institute of Bio-Medical Science at Brighton University recently pointed out in an episode of BBC World Service "Science in Action", in the entire history of Mankind, Herd Immunity has never developed for any virus in the absence of an effective vaccine:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w3cszh10 (18 mins 30 secs in)And once more, even a perfunctory search will demonstrate that that is so, eg https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/herd-immunity-and-covid-19-experts-warn-against-letting-things-rip/ar-BB1aqR9rhttps://inews.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-herd-immunity-explained-less-immune-reinfection-rates-738484https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/10/natural-herd-immunity-mentality-cannot-stop-coronavirus-weak-vaccine-cvd/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/18/covid-herd-immunity-funding-bad-science-anti-lockdown

Richard Cathcart ● 2195d155 Comments ● 2074d

TFL

Are TfL Using Taxpayers Money To Influence RBKC Residents Opinions on Kensington High Street Cycle Lane, Asks GLA Cllr Tony Devenish  London Assembly Member Tony Devenish, has written to the Mayors Cycling Czar Will Norman in the light of deeply concerning information sent to him by a constituent. It is alleged that a company employed by TfL is trying to influence the opinions of residents on the cycle lanes that were removed from Kensington High Street, after they were found to be causing massive gridlock congestion which was adding to pollution. It would be scandalous if TfL are spending taxpayers' money to try to influence opinion on an Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea matters. In the letter Cllr Devenish says he hopes that  Will Norman is able to guarantee that this hasn't happened.The answer to the letter from Will should make interesting reading. TAXI LEAKS EXTRA BIT :The letter address to Dr Will Norman says;Dear willA constituent was contacted by an interviewer from Walnut Unlimited, for a survey on High Street Kensington Cycle Lane. My constituent felt that the purpose of the survey was to blatantly push support for the scheme. Please confirm whether or not Walnut Unlimited is working on behalf of transport for London. If Walnut Unlimited is working for transport for London, how do you justify using taxpayers money to seek to interfere in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea’s legitimate right to decide on this scheme?Will you please supply me with the script that is usedBy Walnut Unlimited’s interviews, to allay fears this survey is aiming to push a specific view onto my local residents.I have copied in the Mayor of London. I hope that you will both recognise that any TfL sponsored intervention would be deeply wrong and, if it has taken place, act swiftly to stop it happening again. Yours sincerelyTony Devenish

Maggie Dodge ● 2074d1 Comments ● 2074d