Forum Topic

Bus drivers views on C9

"In a hard-hitting interview a local Chiswick bus driver has confirmed that C9 is a disaster for Chiswick bus drivers, cyclists, pedestrians and other road users.  He describes being in a near miss with a cyclist and is fearful of what might happen if there is a major incident requiring all emergency services to travel through Chiswick.The bus driver, who has asked to remain anonymous, currently drives E3, 272 and H91 buses and has over 11 years experience driving buses in London.  He volunteered to be interviewed because he is so frustrated by the effects of C9.Speaking candidly, he describes a near miss incident when he stepped off the bus at a changeover point and nearly got run over by a cyclist who was going in a different direction.  This was "a big breach" in safety, he said. He anticipates a "big big big clash” if an ambulance, a fire vehicle and police need to get through Chiswick High Road to reach a significant emergency incident.On travel times he said bus journeys had been drastically affected particularly at changeover points, when buses are loading, and at bus stops, and that this was affecting local businesses.  “There are big long queues” which slow down others’ journeys on Chiswick High Road.  He added that it "is not acceptable” especially "when you think about the ripple effect of it”. “Let’s watch out when everything goes back to normal … it’s going to be mayhem on Chiswick High Road,” he added. “The people who are behind the idea, they need to go back to the drawing board and have a rethink and re plan – listen to the bus drivers, listen to the locals, listen to the passengers and then we can get a better Chiswick” he concluded. The bus driver was interviewed by local resident Mar****e F**w. She asked him for his view and his immediate response showed just how much C9 is of concern to him and his bus driver colleagues.  She then asked him if he would be willing to be interviewed, mindful of the risks involved in speaking out.  He agreed saying it was extremely important to tell people just how concerned bus drivers are. The interview is attached and is available to view/listen.  The driver’s words are spoken exactly as delivered by an actor, to preserve the bus driver’s anonymity."Source: https://www.facebook.com/groups/onechiswick/permalink/3108811546072567/

Loraine Pemberton ● 2069d75 Comments

The new scheme is a disaster yet we get the same bland statements from TFL. The story on the front page has two points. First, TFL claim that bus speeds are broadly the same as 2019. Let that sink in, during lockdown, with traffic volumes down, Heathrow empty, no local sporting or cultural events, and most shops and all bars/ restaurants closed, speeds are broadly the same. You don't need to be a traffic planner to foresee what happens when all of these things reopen. Buses are being sacrificed for the obsession with CS9Secondly, TFL claim that there were serious delays when there were roadworks in the area. Lets be serious, this is London, when are there not roadworks in the W4 area? Recently there were roadworks on Acton Lane, Sutton Court Road and Dukes Avenue at the same time. Only low traffic during lockdown prevented chaos. Acton Lane before the tube station has another hole dug on the pavement and another no smoking sign along from it, exactly the same spot that was dug up recently for gas works. So more roadworks and closures are imminent. TFL and Hounslow know this bridge has structural issues, but choose to ignore it. Its not just roadworks, accidents and incidents on A4, Hogarth, Chiswick roadabout are normally at least a weekly occurrence. Final point, which is the bit that should scare us all. TFL say they will use measures such as 'bus speeds and cycling usage' to asses the scheme. No measure of congestion on surrounding roads or the air quality and pollution this causes, in order to force through the segregated section of CS9.

Paul Green ● 2068d

Sadly yet again Chris forgets to join up his thinking.The places he mentions that are "pedestrianized" are pretty much made into open-air malls. What he neglects to mention is they all have parking infrastructure to deliver these pedestrians and/or public transport to do the same. Another example often cited is Kingston. You know, by the mall. With several multi-story carparks a stone's throw away.He also proves himself disingenuous about no cars on CHR. And we've been through this already as he knows. His response is to blather out something denigrating which usually looks like THIS!Many residential streets only have access from CHR. It will always be so. He forgets about business deliveries and has zero understanding of how that network functions. But by all means, let him tell you what he thinks so long as you don't disagree in which case you're a FOOL! He also has no understanding of how the market works. By reducing access to the retail and services on offer, the value of the properties will decrease. Access to and for the ABC1 demographic will be curtailed. That demographic simply goes elsewhere as "no" is not an acceptable choice. As it was pre-COVID, the density of the local community does not sustain rents and rates at their current level. Increased footfall is needed which means casting a wider net and inviting people in from outside the immediate community. What he's proposing isn't an urban center, he's proposing a lovely little country town market. Only at city rents. In a city. Where people live. And drive cars. As do the black cab drivers and Uber drivers and Zip car operators all of whom would be banned from accessing his utopian village and thus be unable to deliver customers. If customers can't come, they sure as shit won't be spending.

David Lesniak ● 2066d