Legal Challenge to Children's Centre Closures Fails
Judicial review dismisses case against Ealing Council
Save Our Children's Centres supporters demonstrate in front of the High Court. Picture: Facundo Arrizabalaga/MyLondon
April 16, 2026
A judicial review launched by the parents of a two-year-old, against Ealing Council’s plans to close children’s centres, has been dismissed in its entirety.
In June 2025, Ealing Council announced plans to close 12 of the borough’s 25 children’s centres. This was later reduced to ten closures.
The case was heard at the High Court between February 24 and 25 with the decision being made public on Thursday, April 16. The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) understands that the claimant is considering launching an appeal.
Lawyers for the child and their parents argued the case on three grounds.
Claim one: they alleged that Ealing Council had pre-determined the decision to close ten centres before holding a public consultation.
The evidence? Lawyers claimed the fact the savings from the proposed closures were baked into the budget meant that the council had already decided upon the closures – effectively meaning the consultation was not meaningful, rather a tick box exercise.
Claim two: the consultation materials failed to explain why specific centres were chosen for closure versus remaining open, leaving the public unable to comprehensively respond to the consultation.
Claim three: under Section 5A(1) of the Childcare Act 2006, local authorities must ensure “sufficient provision of children’s centres to meet local need”. The claimant argued that the council failed to produce evidence that outcomes for children would not be negatively impacted by the closures.
On claim one, Mr Justice Kimblin rejected the argument, ruling that “the budgetary process was not a thing that was done which required prior consultation” because the budget was merely a proposal at that stage. The judge emphasised that the fact the council reduced the number of closures after the consultation phase meant that the outcome was not pre-determined.
On claim two, the judge found that the council provided an adequate amount of information. He stated that the process generated a “two-way flow of information, which is the essence of the process”, and that it successfully prompted “many articulate and intelligent responses which engaged fully with the issues, which in turn prompted material changes in the proposal”.
On claim three, the judge concluded that the council properly upheld the requirements of the act. He noted that determining sufficiency requires weighing geographical, demographic, and financial factors, and that “the claimant has identified no obvious logical error nor mistake of fact which would permit this court to intervene”.
Because Ealing Council acted lawfully within its discretion across all three issues, the claim for judicial review was dismissed.
The LDRS understands that the claimant is considering launching a further appeal. In a statement shared with the LDRS, Save Ealing Children’s Centres said the group is disappointed at the verdict.
“Despite the legal case failing, we feel proud of our achievements as a campaign group in having fought against the closures. Every avenue to challenge this decision was used: inviting the council to engage with SECC as one of 30 local groups and organisations (which was declined), attending and asking questions at Full Council and scrutiny meetings, holding protests, contacting individual councillors and MPs until finally when all avenues exhausted, a parent on behalf of their child decided to take Ealing Council to the High Court for a Judicial Review…
“Throughout this process, Ealing Council has repeatedly and publicly stated that their decision to close or repurpose these ten children’s centres was part of a strategy to enhance the Early Help Offer, and services to families of young children will improve. However, SECC has never felt that sufficient evidence has been provided to demonstrate that this would improve services.
“Ealing Council claim their decision will increase access for children and families to children’s centre services through outreach and extended hours at the remaining centres. We maintain that the better way of improving the provision is to keep the centres open but to consider ways of improving access and engagement.”
They added: “Regardless, Save Ealing Children’s Centres will continue to monitor how well Ealing Council meet their professed publicly declared aims to meet local need, improve early help – increase children’s centres’ reach, reduce the number of children and families needing a higher level of support and intervention though the closure of 10 children’s centres.”
Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |