Delays To Fire Engines in Ealing Borough Nearly Double in a Year
Opposition says figures prove LTNs were causing more traffic
Fire Engine struggles to get through LTN barrier. Picture: GoFundMe
January 30, 2022
Fire engines being called out to emergencies are being delayed by traffic calming measures – and in Ealing the hold-ups have nearly doubled in a year.
The number of callouts delayed by traffic calming initiatives increased from 59 to 106 between 2020 and 2021, statistics published by the London Fire Brigade (LFB) show.
It comes after nine controversial Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTN) were introduced in the West London borough in the second half of 2020. These figures relate to speed bump hold-ups too.
The LTNs aim was to improve air quality and ease congestion during the pandemic at a time when it was predicted more commuters would drive in response to social distancing requirements.
However, a year later in 2021, seven of the LTNs were scrapped in Ealing following widespread protests from residents and council analysis which showed the LTNs actually increased congestion on other streets.
Although traffic calming includes speed bumps, there is a clear spike in the number of LFB delayed callouts following the introduction of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods.
Between 2019 and 2020, before the introduction of the LTNs, there was an increase of just 11 per cent from 53 callouts to 59 respectively, compared to the 83 per cent increase between 2020 and 2021.
An LFB spokesperson said, “The brigade supports proposals to promote active travel and we work closely with our local authority partners and are consulted when there are any road closure proposals.
“If we have any concerns that any changes may impact our response times, we will raise these and work with the local authority to find the best solution.
“While the data provided will include some in respect of the impact of low-traffic neighbourhood schemes, it also includes all types of other traffic calming measures like speed bumps so it is not accurate to suggest that all delays are due to the LTN schemes.”
Conservative Leader of the Opposition at Ealing Council Councillor Gregory Stafford said, “These figures provide further evidence of unintended but predictably dangerous results of the LTNs in Ealing. Residents’ lives could have been at stake.
“Conservative councillors have always supported local residents in their campaign to remove these ill-thought through and counterproductive traffic barriers.”
Leader of the Ealing Liberal Democrats Councillor Gary Malcolm said, “The Liberal Democrats have said that LTNs do not work.
“They block some emergency vehicles and cause more pollution due to forcing traffic to divert.
“The Liberal Democrats were glad many LTNs were removed but they showed that Labour need to speak to residents before any scheme is implemented.”
An Ealing Council spokesperson said, “The two LTNs currently operating in the borough are camera-enforced, ensuring that emergency services have totally unrestricted access to these areas.
“No concerns have been raised by the LFB since the decision was made to make these schemes permanent.
“The council promised to listen to local people’s views on LTNs and last year, gave everyone living in trial schemes a final say on whether they should be made permanent.
“Two LTNs that had resident support were made permanent, and the LTN trials without resident support were removed.
“The LFB and all emergency services will be fully consulted on any similar initiatives.
“The council is committed to tackling the climate emergency and supporting walking, scooting and cycling across the borough.
“But we know we must take people with us and ensure everyone has a say over change in their neighbourhoods.”
Lisa Haseldine - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |