Forum Topic

I see the usual LCC trolls and their lackeys are out in force to discredit the people of Chiswick. An honest summary of the lively meeting is as follows:It was very upsetting hearing how fearful many people in Chiswick feel about the cycle lane and cyclists behaviour. An  important point that came across loud and clear last night was the strength of feeling and distress the whole cycle lane, as well as the new proposals, has caused/would cause to local residents. It was very upsetting to hear so many people’s accounts of their stressful experience of chiswick whether it’s getting on and off buses, having to alter where they get off to avoid a floating bus stop, attempting to cross the road, the dangers of crossing at the Dukes Avenue junction, the fear people are feeling that they could be seriously injured or lose their lives, and the difficulties they’re having just doing something as basic as getting their shopping. Time and time again individuals described how cyclists are running red lights constantly, not stopping at junctions, riding on the pavements and verbally abusing people, even young children. The most upsetting accounts were from the four or five blind people who attended with their guide dogs or carers, of how their lives in Chiswick have been adversely affected and limited and how they are being excluded from their own community after having lived here for many years. The lady with the guide dog at the front explained how her dog would not be able to tell if a cycle lane was on the pavement as there would be no kerb. For this reason alone the proposal should be scrapped. (And it would be just as dangerous if the cycle lane were built into a channel on the pavement). It is totally outrageous that the net zero and cycling zealots have reduced daily life in Chiswick and many other towns to one of misery and fear. The word used by that lady to describe how she and other blind people are feeling about Chiswick High Road is ‘dread’. Dread.  Where is our humanity? Where is common sense?  A motion was drawn up at the conclusion of the meeting stating that the proposal to put C9 on the pavement starting at the Catholic Church should be scrapped. The proposal is abhorrent to the church congregation as well as to the majority of chiswick residents. It is an abomination and the council should  hang their heads in shame.

Lynda Fisher ● 3d

Michael, as I am familiar with your inflexibility on minor points such as this I won't argue the toss. Can we just say that the cycleway is being built on what used to be a pavement?

Where do you get the information about the low profile kerbs and different materials to be used? These are important details which need to be shared and fears could be allayed if there was a better general understanding of the plans. The designs I've copied at the end of this post are the only ones I've seen and they make no mention of the enhancements you refer to. Is there an updated design or are you being given more information than the general public?

I've seen footage taken of what people at Tolkington Lodge had to say about their experience of visiting Chiswick. I was unaware that they were unable to use the first two bus stops eastbound after Chiswick Lane and felt forced to travel on to Turnham Green using this stretch of pavement (or not!) on the south side to get to shops. There is no point relitigating the floating bus stops as the Cycleway would have been impossible without them but I think we should concede the point that there was a strong view that partially sighted people feel this latest proposal further excludes them from the area. 

The council needs to show that absolutely everything that could be done has been done for this part of our community and that accessibility has not been treated as a box to tick but there has been a gold standard approach to design in this regard.

As I've said before, I think this is a good proposal and the problems are not insuperable. If designs exist that show that the challenges have been properly addressed we should be being told about them. It was very concerning that the council did not send anyone to this week's meeting. If there was a positive story to be told, then you would not expect the absence of a single officer to mean that it wasn't told.

A limited consultation with officers committed to plans that are already drawn up is going to make mistakes. These mistakes could hit certain sections of our community very hard. They will probably not result in the project not achieving its broader objectives so overall if the chance is missed to reduce the harm it causes to some, it will be a missed opportunity.


Jeremy Parkinson ● 1d