Forum Topic

John Bird raises a good point. "why can't we just arrest them and punish them quickly and efficiently."The reason is simple. After the 2008 financial crisis, that brainless goon, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, spent £500 billion  of our money, propping up banks, which even he admitted, were "poorly regulated" . Brown then foolishly gave away the 2010 general election, to the Tories. A bit like asking a lion to look after a lamb !True to form, the Tories set about applying their trusted economic management to restabilise the UK's fiscal position. The governments "austerity programme" set about slashing public spending, across the entire social, judicial, military and health service infrastructure of the UK. After 10 years of Conservative austerity measures, although the economy was managed to produce growth, the judicial services, the prison services and the police services around the UK, were severely reduced. By 2019 massive court backlogs were developing. The prison service was falling apart, with severe staffing shortages.  The police services around the UK were severely under-resourced and at the same time, facing overwhelming demand.All this and whatever good works to the economy that were done, up to 2019, were then swept away by the double-damage COVID epidemic and the triple-disaster that was the Johnson/Truss/Sunak premiership period. These three's premierships,  absolutely trashed the UK's already fragile, yet growing, economy.So, there it is. There aren't enough police to catch smash & grab raiders in Richmond and the criminals know it.  Shoplifters know that they are very unlikely to end up in police custody and even if they do, the courts are so submerged in backlogs, dropping prosecutions now looks like the cost effective way out, for those who want to uphold the law.London needs more police. If police are to be effective, they need a judiciary to prosecute wrongdoers promptly. For prosecuted wrongdoers to then be dealt with , we need more prisons or some sort of creative social justice system.That will all cost a great deal of money.  Do Londoners want to pay more taxes ?Steve Taylor must be an alien, whose only knowledge of life in London is through watching T.V.  Steve Taylor obviously does not understand about Richmond and its his ignorance that is on show, to all.

Roland Bolowski ● 1d

It isn't ALL up to the Mayor of London when they are so many NATIONWIDE problems many of which have been caused by the removal of funds from Councils by Govt and the closing down and selling off of national infrastructure such as Police Stations and Courts and the mess that has been made of the Court System, the lack of maintenance of public buildings and the dismantling of the Probation Service causing a huge increase in the number of repeat offenders instead of those leaving prison being helped to find homes and jobs and to stay on the straight and narrow.  There are a huge number of children who have SEND in schools and their are also a huge number of prisoners who have learning difficulties.  We have overcrowded prisons with huge numbers of prisoners who are in prison ON REMAND and not sentenced.  It can take years now to get your day in Court.  A previous Govt had this great idea that we would copy the American system instead of carrying on or just altering our own.  A considerable proportion of their population are in prison and return again and again and again.  It never used to be as bad here and prisoners used to be taught skills that they could use when they left and also gain some more education but more recently they have just been locked up for hours on end in VICTORIAN prisons.Many prison staff with experience were replaced by youngsters without the experience of the older staff and staff outsourced from other countries all in the neo-liberal bid to reduce the costs to the state.  One way that backfired was when it was then discovered that a whole cohort of staff weren't earning enough to have their visas extended/renewed.  Continuity is more important in some workplaces than others to get the best results but that obviously just wasn't considered a priority. I think Emma Elizabeth was just looking for an excuse to stir things up - as we have seen before.I didn't hear anything on the podcast mentioned and in the Evening Standard it was definitely a far more informative answering of questions re statistics than was alleged.

Philippa Bond ● 6d

There seems to be an unwillingness here to consider the facts that the evidence so far is pointing to ‘The Trump Method’  being a failure.Let’s assume for a moment that it was working and Reform were actually suggesting this as a policy, there still would be no way they could actually implement it.The US dollar is a reserve currency which means that Trump has no fiscal constraints whereas in the UK our debt levels mean that we are just a few wrong decisions from a collapse in market confidence and a financial crisis.Assuming a Reform Westminster Government decided to focus on migrant crime then this effort would necessarily be concentrated in London where the vast majority of people working in this country illegally are situated. If at the same time, there was a Reform Mayor in London it would not be down to them to implement this crackdown. The equivalent agency to ICE in the UK is the Border Force which is a central government body under the Home Office. The Met would not be involved in immigration enforcement.Trump has boosted ICE’s budget to around £23billion which compares to the Met’s budget of just over £1billion. He has been able to do this without needing to redirect resources from other law enforcement agencies but this would not be possible in the UK due to the fiscal constraints a Reform government would operate under.It should also be remembered that Trump’s policy is profoundly unpopular and he can only continue to push through with it because he will never be elected president again (it doesn’t necessarily follow that he won’t continue to be president after the end of his current term but that’s another topic).To me, this whole thing seems a bit of a dead end for Reform. While Sir Sadiq’s record on crime is mixed it isn’t disastrous in a historic or geographic context and certainly there has been no migrant crime wave in London. The Musk/Trump/Maga playbook of creating division and fear on the issue of crime doesn’t seem likely to work in London. Every survey seems to show most Londoners feel their city is safe and there is a growing resentment about the way the capital is being talked down. This is having a detrimental effect on London’s reputation which reduces visitors both from within the UK, where there is an increasing acceptance that the city is a crime ridden hell hole and from overseas. This is having an impact on people’s livelihoods and therefore is not a great way to win votes.Having found a presentable and non-swivel-eyed candidate for London, Reform did have a chance of a shock win but, by leading on crime they are blowing it. While the Mayor’s record on crime can be debated, he cannot defend his policies on housing which have been a disaster and this matters far more to Londoners than any other issue. Reform should be focusing on this and making the centrepiece of their campaign the ending of ‘affordable’ housing requirements on new developments. Transport would also rank above crime. Reform has said they would scrap ULEZ but haven’t explained how they would then fill the hole left in TfL’s budget.  Putting together a vote winning programme on transport would be difficult because of fiscal constraints but there are probably a range of policies that voters would find appealing e.g. making traffic and parking fines received while at work tax deductible, capping the amount council’s can make from fines and requiring all junction changes to increase capacity for traffic.In a way, Reform is a gift to Sir Sadiq. It’s surge in the polls will galvanise left leaning residents to vote for him while splitting right leaning voters meaning that he is benefitting hugely from the first past the post system. While Reform is fighting a social media culture war rather than an election, he looks nailed on for a fourth term.

Francis Rowe ● 10d

Thanks for the Braverman link. I agree that Laila will no doubt get loads of support due to Kahn’s inadequacies as highlighted by your link. “The mayor has failed to address the shocking rise in violent crimeEight years of Sadiq Khan’s London and what do we have to show for it? Tragically, not much. In fact, I’d challenge anyone to think of a positive legacy from his mayoralty. We mustn’t forget how he’s renamed the train lines, of course, or expanded his punitive Ulez car tax, or created a fake beach, or let a Donald Trump blimp float over the city, or allowed a Jewish minority to become terrified of going into the city centre almost every week. All at the same time as achieving the ignominious accolade of London being declared the “knife crime capital”.While I no longer live there, having grown up in London and run for the Greater London Assembly over a decade ago, it now seems rougher, messier and sadder than it was before. I recall the joyous community spirit that flowed through the streets during the 2012 Olympics, the bustling bars and restaurants, the brilliant Boris Bikes and the new Routemaster buses. Now, you have a sense of a city which has been treading water and, in other respects, actually going backwards.For many, London is less safe today than ever before. During Khan’s tenure, the Metropolitan Police has deteriorated so badly that it’s been forced into special measures. It was then judged to be wholly dysfunctional by Baroness Casey, whose report tore strips off the mayor for failing to hold the police to account.”

Steve Taylor ● 11d

I have replied to questions on Nicky Campbell's Show on Five Live and/or on Radio 4's Woman's Hour about all sorts of things eg attacks on the tube or in the cinema that I never told my parents about or never told the police about.  People do often tell about their experiences.  Others tell of their experiences like going for an illegal abortion and being picked up by their father afterwards who would never ever ever mention the subject... All of this has been happening all the time.  It's nothing new.  It gets better and worse.  It changes. I was just reading yesterday about huge amounts of cocaine coming into the country in crates of bananas destined for the supermarkets years and years ago.  We didn't  hear about a lot of it then.  Social media has increased the spread of news - and rolling news makes it even worse.  I saw a Facebook post today designed to whip up hysteria.  Who knows if it is even true.  People with agendas write things to cause discussion and improve understanding but often division too.  Just like in the Falklands War when every time they announced a ship had been sunk you had to check that it wasn't the same one that you had already heard about.Unfortunately there are some people with prejudices who deliberately insist on stirring up prejudice for political reasons which causes even more alarm when the majority of residents of all communities get on very well together.I've seen the Mayor being asked very awkward deliberately designed questions to cause dissent and division between Londoners, people of different political parties who are quite deliberately attempting to lay bear traps for him.  So I'm not surprised that he is very wary - his job is to keep Londoners together and not fall prey to those trouble makers trying to cause division.  Boris Johnson looked just like a naughty schoolboy.  He was charismatic but a charismatic chaotic disaster who was responsible for closing and selling off masses of police stations making it harder for anyone to report any crimes!  But never mind he did have a had a lovely smile and a nice accent.  Don't see much of him now though.

Philippa Bond ● 23d