Forum Topic

I really don't think that the Brexit vote spoke to people's fears about immigration. The real discontent was the economy, the neglect of the regions and the impoverishment of the less well-off in society, mostly those far from court. The dishonest and disastrous austerity programme created the conditions which the ghastly little xenophobe, Farage, exploited for his own nefarious ends. In his project to blame "the other" for the problems of the UK he was stoutly supported by the Tory tabloids. Cameron was an idiot not to realise how the vote would go. He obviously never went into a newsagents or a supermarket, and read the headlines. Almost every day in the run-up to the referendum The Mail and the Express carried stories, many completely false, about yet another EU outrage.And here we are today: austerity has nominally been dropped,  but it still lingers on - in Rachel Reeves's reluctance to abandon Tory fiscal rules, lest she leave the Labour government open to the usual lazy charges of spendthrift irresponsibility. Nor does she have the courage to borrow her way out of the hole dug over 14 years, lest she alarm the bond market. Thus we remain in the same old bind - increased taxation or public service cuts?The discontent which drove Brexit continues, and provides Farage with an ever more solid platform for his odious views. And Starmer doesn't have the courage to stand up to him, and call him out. Instead, he tries to counter the drift to Farage by copying him. The May White Paper on Immigration proposed, inter alia: ending the exemption for social workers; reducing the length of the graduate visa for international students to stay on and work in the UK from 2 years to 18 months; requiring the partners of people moving to the UK on work visas to have basic English to qualify for a dependant visa; and increasing the qualifying period for settlement from 5 to 10 years. And don't forget Starmer's "island of strangers" comment. In all that he says, and his government proposes, Starmer gives credibility to Farage. After she's lived here for almost 42 years, my wife has applied for UK citizenship, because we don't like the direction of this country, with Farage allowed to set the agenda. Grow some, Keir!

Robert Fish ● 3d

This government is not clever they take a sledge hammer to all policies instead of being smart. Take the winter fuel payments people living on pension credit get it thats just mad. So what happens a U turn, increasing doctors pay no one has an issue with that but get something back for us the tax payer, we subsidise their training make them give back and increase the numbers of years they have to give back to the NHS before they go on to get high paid careers. Increase the NI for major global corps not to every company the number of businesses that have closed particularly in hospitality, SME’s etc. just mad and not smart. Attack the wealthy over 10,000 millions of left taking their tax somewhere else mad. Attack home owners who have jobs, pay tax, pay ridiculous stamp duty % to provide a roof over their heads and don't take benefits. None of this makes any sense. Yet still they think they can tax their way out of trouble is doesn't work they must be stupid history has proven it doesn't work. Corp tax is 25% that heavy on top of the employers NI, pension contribution. Labour are robbing all of us! So they are coming after everyone, foolish politics. There real issue is that labour is divided with hard left MP’s. There is not room in todays society to be far left or right but if Labour keep going Reform will get in at the next election so we swing right mad. We need sensible centralist politics, we should be inspiring people to achieve not punishing them will ever increasing taxes.

Jayne Thorburn ● 9d

She has not created the £50billion deficit, that is a lie. (And I thought it was 40 not 50).  The £20bn gap you mention was well known even before the general election and was highlighted in the OBR reports as well as by other economic think tanks and economists. It was also widely reported In decent newspapers and on say LBC. Look it up. There is a further disputed £12 billion gap left behind by the previous government. Yes, labour have spent a bit more e.g. on pay rises for teachers and nurses and doctors. But these were modest rises given years of pay stagnation and was urgently needed to address increasing shortages. Even now, more doctors are leaving the UK to go and work abroad  for better money. Much of the black hole is due to Jeremy Hunt who cut 4% from employee NI which was unaffordable and at least in part uncosted. Again, this was well known before the general election. Look at the OBR report written before the general election if you want the details. Labour willingly fell into the trap left by hunt and refused to reverse the NI cuts as part of their tax pledge.  Of course, if they had not promised no tax rises, they would have been eviscerated by the media. Instead, labour have put up employer NI which obviously hits business and consequently employment. Not a good move. Reeves attempts at balancing the books have been hampered by her own party who do not want to reduce welfare spending. But there is a bigger picture: The UK, like most countries in the west, has insufficient numbers of people in work to support the growing numbers who have retired. Baby boomers are all retiring. This means that pension payouts and the demands on the NHS have increased. These are two massive expenditures for the state. That’s why things like the winter fuel allowance and even the triple lock are simply unsustainable. It’s also why the state pension age is likely to rise again. The UK has an additional problem that other Western countries don’t have: The long-term drag of Brexit. It may not be talked about very much anymore, but it’s still costing us about £5 billion a year. The idea of a sellers tax has been doing the rounds for a long time and is intended as a replacement for stamp duty. Personally, I don’t think it is a good idea nor do I think it will happen. Whatever party was in government, the question would remain: what does it do to raise taxes or reduce spending.  it’s one or the other. If it’s reducing spending then on what?Personally, I think that most working people are paying enough income tax  and I would agreed that there are some disincentives to work within the tax system. But some unearned income remains taxed at a low rate. Rishi Sunak was famously taxed at a 23% rate on his income of £2 million. This is a far lower rate of tax than many working people who are on a much lower income.  factor in council tax and the disparity is even greater. One further point on tax that I stumbled across the other day; latest estimates are that HMRC failed to collect £46.8bn in tax last year bringing the total to £500bn since 2010. Neatly the amount they failed to collect in tax, much from corporations, is almost the same as the deficit.

David Turner ● 10d