Forum Topic

It is hard to see how displacement of parking and traffic from the Mid Chiswick CPZ won't lead to demands for Sunday parking restrictions in adjacent areas and the eventual introduction of universal restrictions across the centre of town.Sainsbury's will be the exception but how long that car park will be with us is hard to tell.The fears that this would lead to the end of the markets seems to be misplaced as the council has set the precedent for their car parks remaining free on Sundays even if the surrounding CPZ has restrictions. This removes the risk of a financial opportunity cost of allowing events to take over car parks making it less likely they will get licences. They will probably see footfall dip a bit particularly the flower and antiques market where people who buy more require a car to take it home.Local churches are not going to be happy about it and businesses to will be up in arms. It is probably best to ignore people who have never ran a shop in their life telling you that it doesn't hurt a business if it is more difficult for people to park. Chiswick shops have high fixed costs and generally low margins so small changes in turnover can have dramatic effects on profitability. It will be particularly challenging because many nearby equivalent town centres have free Sunday parking including Ealing and everywhere in Kensington and Chelsea.  Traders selling things will find it more difficult but there has been a long term trend of them disappearing from the High Road. Top end restaurants will suffer a bit because nobody wants to cram Sunday lunch into an hour and a half due to parking ticket expiry. However, other businesses less dependent on customers arriving by car will probably take the place of those forced to close.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 22d

I've seen the article but the determination to put Cllr Biddolph at the centre of the story seems to be masking what is actually going on.There is a danger of Biddolph Derangement Syndrome becoming contagious and certainly two of her colleagues seem to be more victims, laying into her on the issue.They don't actually appear to have read her submission to the Licensing Panel or spoken to her and such dysfunction in the Conservative group may provide some explanation for last night's defection.You obviously haven't looked at her submission either otherwise you would know that, in context to say "Cllr Biddolph wrote to the Licensing Panel saying they should not be allowed to park there" is a very misleading statement. Technically it is true but it leaves out the very important bit about that she said this should be offset by allocated parking for market traders in schools or in the car parking by the Town Hall. Given the existing parking stress on some market days and the problems it is causing for residents, this seems like a good solution and she copied her letter to the council officer responsible for parking.A link to the letter is below, and while no evidence is going to convince the Biddolph Bashers, I think any fair minded person would see a councillor trying to balance the needs of residents, local businesses and the markets.https://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/documents/s200261/Chiswick%20Flower%20Market%20-%20Appendix%20E.pdfThe narrative that she is behind the sudden withdrawal of the Bond Street parking privilege relies on the parking officer reading her letter and ignoring everything she said apart from the reference to that and doing it in a way that basically disadvantages everybody. To me, this doesn't fit the facts that we know, there is some key missing information in this story.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 28d