Forum Topic

Indeed we should be conscious of the consequences of our actions and recognise that regularly choosing to use a car when more socially and personally productive choices are available to us is a net negative for all.I don't think it is unjustifiable to take a drive to walk a dog in Richmond Park but one should be realistic about the consequences Jayne is causing for people around her and certainly not seek to use it as a case to justify resisting efforts to reduce people's dependency on using cars for regular short local journeys and the cumulative number of those journeys. As a reminder reducing short car journeys has multiple beneficial impacts for society in addition to the environmental ones: reduced pollution, reduced road deaths and injuries (the stats on collision reduction on internal and boundary roads from the 3 LTNs that are about to be made permanent in Haringey are startling), reduced cost of congestion, reduced pressure on emergency services, improved health and wellbeing with reduced pressure on the NHS, reduced capital and operating budgets for highways.Jayne is very concerned about the economy, pressure on public services and how taxpayer money is spent so she should be a big cheerleader for reducing the tax burden caused by so many people regularly chosing to use a costly and unproductive means of transport even when others are readily available to them even if it requires a little more effort and get up and go. I have never driven a SUV to the Alps so I couldn't comment on that but I agree that people have choices to make and encourage them to think about the impact of those choices. Advocates of personal responsibility will agree loudly with me I am sure ...

Paul Campbell ● 21d

Firstly, no dispute here that reducing short car journeys is good for everybody.However, it is worth considering how this can be achieved and how effective policies might be.The figures provided originally are national and from a time when public transport use was suppressed by the pandemic.However, TfL has produced figures which suggest that one third of car journeys in London could be walked in 25 minutes. Government data for Chiswick High Road indicates the proportion of cars and Taxis is around 60% and that around 20% of outer London car journeys are taxis. That indicates that around 16% of private car journeys along Chiswick High Road are of this short duration.Out of those you need to consider a whole range of legitimate reasons the somone might have for taking a short journey - disabled driver or passenger, delivery driver, other work related activities, social care workers and health visitors, transporting a heavy item. You can have a view about how high or low a proportion this would be but it would be a stretch to claim that if you exclude these categories you wouldn't be left with a single digit proportion of journeys that could potentially be classed as 'unnecessary'.You then have the problem with how you deal with these as many of these journeys will be taken by entitled but relatively wealthy drivers who will not change their behaviour if you seek to use cost as the motivation.Probably, the most effective way to make people change their habits is by stressing the health benefits of walking and cycling but, although this could be transformative for individuals, it will make a very marginal difference to traffic and pollution.The best way to do that is obviously to target longer journeys by providing better and cheaper public transport options.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 22d

Here is a good and recent article explaining for those who struggle to understand why replacing as many short local journeys currently taken by car with other modes is good for absolutely everybody. And note that the UK is even worse than the US for short trips being taken by car.https://theconversation.com/the-worlds-280-million-electric-bikes-and-mopeds-are-cutting-demand-for-oil-far-more-than-electric-cars-213870"On the world’s roads last year, there were over 20 million electric vehicles and 1.3 million commercial EVs such as buses, delivery vans and trucks.But these numbers of four or more wheel vehicles are wholly eclipsed by two- and three-wheelers. There were over 280 million electric mopeds, scooters, motorcycles and three-wheelers on the road last year. Their sheer popularity is already cutting demand for oil by a million barrels of oil a day – about 1% of the world’s total oil demand, according to estimates by Bloomberg New Energy Finance.What about electric vehicles, you ask? After all, EVs have been heralded as a silver bullet for car emissions and air pollution in cities, as their tailpipe emissions are zero. If charged with renewable power, they get even greener.But to see them as an inarguable good is an error. They are cleaner cars, but they are still cars, taking up space on the roads and requiring a lot of electricity to power them. Their batteries make them heavier than a traditional car, and draw heavily on the extraction of rare earth elements. While EVs are overall much greener than internal combustion engine cars, battery manufacture can undermine some of the gains."

Paul Campbell ● 24d