Forum Topic

Interesting to read how The Guardian reported on this at the time;"Britain is on a collision course with the European Union over vaccine shortages after Brussels refused to accept that people in the UK have first claim on Oxford/AstraZeneca doses produced in local plants.The EU’s health commissioner outright dismissed on Wednesday an argument made by Pascal Soriot, the Anglo-Swedish company’s chief executive, that he was contractually obliged to supply the UK first.In a withering statement, Stella Kyriakides said the UK should not earn any advantage from signing a contract with AstraZeneca three months before the EU’s executive branch put pen to paper.“We reject the logic of first come, first served,” the commissioner said. “That may work in a butcher’s shop but not in contracts and not in our advanced purchase agreements.”"..... the company has assured the British government, which chose not to be part of the EU vaccine programme, that it will fulfil its promise to deliver 2m doses a week for the benefit of UK residents."" ......The European commission is rifling through customs records over fears vaccines made on EU territory have been shipped to the UK. “The customs data do not lie,” a senior EU official said. “You can be assured that we will find the information, that’s for sure.”Kyriakides said: “No company should be under any illusion that we don’t have the means to understand what is happening.”The clash between British and European interests, after a year of tense negotiations over post-Brexit trade and security, poses a threat to relations at a time when EU institutions and 27 EU governments are coming under criticism for the slow deployment of their vaccination programmes.While the UK has administered vaccine first doses to more than 10% of adults and plans to vaccinate the most vulnerable 15 million – including all over-70s – by mid-February, the EU has reached 2% so far. The UK’s regulator approved the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine in late December.Kyriakides said that under its contract with AstraZeneca, four European plants were named as suppliers and two of those were based in the UK, and she expected them to work for EU citizens.Kyriakides, a Cypriot who studied in Britain, said the argument was unacceptable and the company had a moral duty to treat the EU similarly to the UK.She said: “We are in a pandemic. We lose people every day. These are not numbers, they’re not statistics. These are persons with families with friends and colleagues that are all affected as well.“Pharmaceutical companies, vaccine developers have moral, societal and contractual responsibilities, which they need to uphold. The view that the company is not obliged to deliver because we signed a best effort agreement is neither correct, nor is it acceptable.”Kyriakides said there was no “priority clause” that would justify British residents benefiting first from doses made in the UK.TO ME THERE IS A SIMPLE CONCLUSION: BRITISH SELF INTEREST 1, EU COMMISSION BUREAUCRACY 0.

Sam Hearn ● 47d

Just to hopefully finally lay to rest the falsehood about Brexit enabling a faster rollout of the vaccine in the UK it is worth repeating again some of the facts.The UK did have a faster rollout than the European average. This was partly due to the early placing of orders for the Astra Zeneca jab and the existing public health infrastructure.It was categorically not due to us being free from restrictive EU rules. The vaccine was authorised by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).The coordination of regulation of medicines across the EU is done by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which we remained a member of up until the end of 2020. The departure from this organisation around the same time as the vaccine rollout is coincidental.Under a treaty agreed in 2012 the UK had the option to fast track the release of medicines in a public health emergency whether we were a member of EMA or not. The vaccine approval was done under “regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations 2012”. To be clear this means that there was no difference between what we were allowed to do within the EU and outside it during Covid.It is perhaps worth reflecting that the innovation and research that enabled the Astra Zeneca vaccine to be developed will certainly have been helped by having the EMA, the EU regulator based in this country, which was a competitive advantage to our pharmaceutical industry. Since 2020 there has been little divergence between us and the UK in terms of medicine approval which means we are a rule taker rather. You'd need to be very naïve to assume that preference isn't given to EU based applications for new medicines.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 47d

Brian, can you really be so dense that you can’t recognise blatant sarcasm?  If you manage to get your head out of the sand and actually read travel expert Simon Calder’s very amusing, and strictly factual article, you would see that he was actually showing us in great detail how damaging Brexit has been for travellers and holiday makers to Europe and more broadly for Britain’s post-Brexit status in the world. Here’s the link again.  If you can’t be bothered to read the quite short article or have nothing relevant to say then maybe try not to post?https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-border-bonus-brussels-entry-exi-b2624086.html?s=08And Denis, there was a  sense of camaraderie in the march but that was then.  What remains with us now is an anger and determination to continue reminding people, especially politicians, of the damage that Brexit has done and continues to do to the interests and welfare of this country.  And sorry but we also have to remind people of the lies, mixed messages and false promises of the Leave campaign however uncomfortable that may be.  Understanding this will help bring about change for the better.  You too please read the article.  And once you have, please then think of the broader picture, issues such as how ruinous Brexit has been to the prospects of touring musicians, farmers, fishermen, business in general especially importers and exporters and so on.  It just made no sense to break have broken off a trading agreement with our nearest neighbours.  When Johnson said ‘F*ck business’, whether he meant it or not that’s what he achieved.Janice, manifestos aren’t always adhered to but red lines tend to be and that is a major problem for the Starmer government.  Cherry picking will only get us so far.  If Starmer had the will and a magic wand and was able to move us right back into the E.U. then we would actually begin to see some real growth.  Of course that isn’t going to happen any time soon but it surely will eventually when enough people wake up to the reality of the harm we have done to ourselves through voting for Brexit.

Alastair Banton ● 48d