Forum Topic

The residency permit system under the withdrawal agreement was for full time UK residents in a EU country. The details varied slightly for each EU country but the basics were the same: evidence that you have been a full time resident prior to 31/12/2020 (and that you meet criteria such as means to live without state aid) and you were given a residency permit and thus rights to live and work in that country (but that country only and not pan-EU rights of residency.)There will have been plenty of examples of second home owners who also applied for this residency permit. They decided, when faced with their stay in that second home being limited to 90 days out of 180, that obtaining a residency permit under false pretenses (i.e. they lied about being full time residents) would be good for them. It would give them access to their second home anytime for as long as they liked. In doing so they also decided that (1) they did not care about burdening the system with their false applications at the detriment of genuine applications being processed; and (2) that it was worth the risk of the local authorities noting their statement of being full time resident and demanding full taxation for as long as they were/are residents. There are, to my knowledge, no EU country which has acted outside the withdrawal agreement rules and knowingly given residency permits to UK citizens who did not make the claim of being full time resident. So expect lots of stories of people who had falsely obtained a residency permit now bleating because they subsequently obtained a massive tax demand. And after this year the rules are also clear - any UK citizen wishing to move full time to a EU country must do so as a third country national - that is, first obtain a visa, second apply for residency in the same was anyone from outside the EU must do.

Alan Clark ● 910d