Forum Topic

Let's all see this clearly for what it is.  This is nothing to do with voter fraud.  There is no evidence of widespread fraud - even Handcock's admits this: - "six cases is six to many" (contrasted with the Government's refusal to investigate foreign interference in the electoral process and the Referendum – remember that the reviewers found no interference because they were specifically instructed not to look for any).Handcock's logic is that we should prevent 11 million people from voting legally (or at least make it substantially harder for them to do so) to prevent perhaps six cases of people voting illegally. That doesn't make sense.  It gives the lie to the true reasons for the policy. This is about disenfranchisement. It is a policy by a morally corrupt government who have repeatedly ignored constitutional norms (including a degree of honourability) on which the Westminster model depends to function properly.  It is straight out of Trump's playbook, and mimics widely reported efforts in the US to suppress voting by the less advantaged (who are less likely to vote Republican, or in the UK for the Conservatives).  This is about building a path to a single party state.This goes hand in hand with the proposal to "review" (i.e. abolish) the right to Judicial Review of ministerial decisions (i.e. for the courts to review whether an action by the Government is legal or not) which is a fundamental pillar of our democracy and protection against descent into authoritarianism.  I remember spending a lot of time at law school studying the constitutional importance of the "seperation of powers", so that each branch of the state could be held to account, as critical to a functioning democracy. We are living in very dangerous times. 

T P Howell ● 1990d