Forum Topic

You Want World Control

You’re a member of an elitist secret society. You have fellow members in top government positions around the world, in the mainstream media and in the judiciary. You have human targets en masse who you wish to impoverish. You also wish to control their movements – where they can go, who they can see, in what environment and when, if you provide any permissions at all. You also want to control your targets biologically by injection. You’ve seen how other evil dictators have tried and failed in the past. You know you need to think smart; so how might you do it?

Michael Brown ● 2055d58 Comments

First thing I’d do as one of the elite is to eliminate those that are trying to warn the people about what we the elite are up to.

Andrew Jones ● 2055d

Bread and circuses. The last thing a controlling elite wants to do is upset their worker bees. Keep them happy, monitor them via their mobile phones - happily adopted by all. If you want biological control add whatever it is to babies’ first jabs and no one would be any the wiser. Also means elite don’t unexpectedly catch the ‘fake?’ Covid.

Vivienne Cox ● 2055d

I would use the magician’s art of misdirection.  I would covertly employ a number of unwitting stooges - useful idiots - who claim to be ‘in the know’ but are making sure people look in wrong directions so that I can carry on my work undetected.

Alastair Banton ● 2054d

Well , I would look up how to do it on Google. Get some ideas,  maybe then check out (U)tube for actual followable and demonstrated instructions.  This is what I do with most things theses days, so I don't think I'd change my reliable MO just for this .

Andrew Craig ● 2054d

I'd start by 'binge watching' this series and then tell me you won't have a vaccine:

Martin Weaver ● 2054d

Plus - as you strip away the liberties of your victims, and plot to force-inject them, you want them to believe that your actions are due to your immense care for them; so much so, that they thank you, with many asking for further actions. See if you can find a way of muzzling them too, with them still thinking it's all about your care for them. This is a huge challenge, I know, a total round-up of the cattle, with few suspecting anything; but put your mind to it...

Michael Brown ● 2054d

But as it's being rolled out in every country, is world power being happily shared?  Who is or are "you' ?

Claire Moran ● 2054d

How many times are we told over the years we are being controlledMostly by Aliens.

Janice Evans ● 2054d

I’d keep it secret. Then I’d trick gullible truth seekers into posting videos of false flag conspiracies to keep them off my track.

Russell Pearson ● 2054d

Why is everyone giving Michael ideas for his project?

Simon Temple ● 2054d

Tried to move them off track. 😉

Janice Evans ● 2054d

I believe the Royals are lizards.

Basil Finnis ● 2054d

Like dinosaurs?

Simon Temple ● 2054d

and why wouldn't we all want the injection if it gives us better 5G reception?

James Roy ● 2054d

Because if that happened we can't play the 'sorry I didn't join the webex, my connection was down' card.

Simon Temple ● 2054d

You're all suffering from Stockholm syndrome.

Michael Brown ● 2054d

Never been to Norway.

Simon Temple ● 2054d

"You Want World Control"Is that all?I bought one of those Universal Remote Controls the other day.But it doesn't control the Universe.Not even remotely...

Richard Cathcart ● 2054d

YOU SCOUNDREL! HA HA! (nice one rich!)

Simon Temple ● 2054d

Richard Cathcart lol 😂😂😂😂😂

Donna Fraser ● 2053d

Since having my first jab we are getting much quicker broadband. largely because I contacted Virgin and switched to a faster broadband last week.

Chris Blackwell ● 2053d

So - you cunning fellow with your disinformation, even if have indeed never been to Norway, you are clearly concealing your frequent trips to Stockholm, where you almost certainly contracted the syndrome ....

James Tickell ● 2053d

You lot seem to think this is going to end. It isn't. They'll keep going with this until the country is totally financially destroyed, and you'll have to make do with the Universal Basic Income they plan to introduce. Your rushed blood-clotting jabs will mean nothing; and you won't be able to get enough injections to keep your 'health' passport up to date.You fools..

Michael Brown ● 2053d

MB: "You lot seem to think this is going to end. It isn't."So what's the "this", then? Your bonkers theorising?Anyhow, while you were spouting crap about 9/11 and Sandyhook etc, which none of us actually had personal experience of, you could just about claim to be one step ahead.But now that you're posting crap about Covid-19, which everyone now knows from personal experience, then whatever remaining credibility you might have claimed has now been flushed back down the crapper whence it came, and where it belongs.For we all know your original sequence of lies:1. Covid-19 doesn't exist;2. Well maybe it does, but it's no worse than flu;3. It's not actually killing people, as the excess death rate will demonstrate.You might now try to disassociate yourself from it, but you were claiming all of those last year, and all have since been exposed for the crock of brown stuff that they really are.So why would anyone give house room to your latest crap?

Richard Cathcart ● 2053d

No more lies please, least of all en masse. Your denial of the holocaust is more than enough.

Michael Brown ● 2053d

Do you deny that last year you claimed Covid didn't exist/was no worse than flu/isn't actually killing people?As for the Holocaust, I concur completely with the universally accepted narrative that it was a genocidal attempt by the Nazi's to exterminate the whole of European Jewry, plus various other (so-called) "undesirables", such as Roma, Gays, Communists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Freemasons, mentally disabled etc.And that approximately 6m people perished at the hands of their firing squads and in the death camps etc before they were stopped.Of course you have never once put your name to such an explicit and unambiguous acceptance of the Holocaust, even when challenged directly.Which leads me to conclude that it is YOU who denies it and are only flinging out vile accusations against me in order to deflect from your true, though hidden, feelings on the matter.Though as I've said previously, you only have to come out and publicly accept the fact of The Holocaust, and I will apologise unreservedly and retract.I'm still waiting.

Richard Cathcart ● 2053d

Michael — you keep telling us what is going to happen and that we are all fools but what is it exactly that you want us to do? We have none of the Intel that you appear to have (although exactly why a carpenter from London would have access to this information still baffles me) but supposing the NWO enslaves everybody and everything you bang on about actually happens? Presumably you would be in the same boat as everyone else? Unless of course you will be running an elite force of resistance fighters from an underground HQ in the new super sewer being built in Hammersmith ... oh hang on, that's Terminator isn't it.

Chris Blackwell ● 2052d

That's Michael all over.He flings out posts claiming something or other, and later on, when you try to take him to task about something that he's written that has been proved to be complete bo***cks he doesn't respond to what you are saying but throws out some new conspiracy s**t.

Andrew Jones ● 2052d

Am I right in thinking that Lady GaGa is considered to be a Satanic Witch of the NWO? Will I gro horns if I listen to her music or is there a little wiggle room here? ?

Chris Blackwell ● 2052d

“ fellow members in top government positions around the world, in the mainstream media and in the judiciary”Any locals in it? We have a good few media bods in W4, must be a few who are in Michael’s elitist secret squirrel club, surely...Donald Pleasance and his white cat?

Russell Pearson ● 2052d

Cathy asks the same old questions, which I've answered before.Johnson continues with his fascist State plans in Parliament, today, where a Bill is being voted on to take away rights of protesters. It's a critical vote hence the Everard story used to distract the public in the build up.

Michael Brown ● 2051d

I've been waiting for a report on how the nanobots in the Covid vaccine are now causing blood clots, but only for EU citizens. There must be some sort of dastardly plot going on here, surely ?

Richard Greenhough ● 2051d

During a pandemic they should probably be banned unless run by a Responsible organisation.

Janice Evans ● 2051d

My reply was to Michael, we posted at the same time.

Janice Evans ● 2051d

If Michael concentrated more on real threats to our freedoms such as the new bill, and loss of liberty in lockdown, rather than on lurid conspiracy theories, he might just might have more impact and credibility.

Russell Pearson ● 2051d

Michael — I do think you need to chill. It is quite alarming how you see plots and schemes and Dr Evil in everything and I can only imagine how exhausting your life must be. Life is beautiful, try to appreciate it without looking for ridiculous subtext in everything.
As for your idea about fascist state plans to remove the rights of protestors ... I can see that if you believe the pandemic to be fake and the wearing of masks to be a personal infringement and the vaccine to be a controlling device then police breaking up a (peaceful) protest because of the risk of a third Covid wave must be very hard for you to understand. But remove yourself from the veil of nonsense you inhabit and imagine, just for one moment, that there IS a worldwide pandemic and that mass gatherings assist the spread of contagion ... perhaps a temporary ban on protests might be a good idea?
Oh and I don't like the way you said "The Everard story used to distract the public" — I do hope you are not suggesting that Sarah Everard's murder was faked.

On the other hand I am just a foolish satanic forum sheep complete with a vaccine induced blood clot riddled brain who needs to wake up.

Chris Blackwell ● 2051d

Chris, the new bill is for post COVID...

Russell Pearson ● 2051d

The new M1 chip and the integrated SoC that Apple has built around it are designed to control the population.  Control of the population by vaccine is only necessary for those who don’t have a mobile phone.

James Roy ● 2051d

Another advance is a variation of the canine chip, expected to be activated and rolled-out from April 1st - triggering dogs to lead owners into lavish underground health pods where they can be reprogrammed in under a minute via advanced laser penetration, invisible and undetectable to human senses...

Stuart Kerr ● 2051d

"...lavish underground health pods..."So that is what they are really building underneath Barnes Bridge. No wonder it is so expensive.

Richard Greenhough ● 2051d

Russel — I didn't know that. I stand corrected!

Chris Blackwell ● 2051d

MB: "Cathy asks the same old questions, which I've answered before."RC: There's one question which you've consistently refused to answer, namely:'Do you concur with, or deny, the commonly accepted narrative that the Nazi's murdered around 6m people (mostly but not exclusively Jewish) in a genocidal plan known as The Holocaust?'Or do you hope to avoid answering the question by continuing to make the entirely false claim that I am a Holocaust Denier?

Richard Cathcart ● 2051d

Richard (Cathcart).... as a grown man living comfortably in West London (a leafy suburb riddled with Nazis)  who spends his days in a futile forum campaign to flush out a local chap you suspect of being a holocaust denier, I ask two simple questions.  Yes or No please  (failure to deny either will be taken as proof positive).... are you absolutely sure you're of sound mind?.. have you nothing better to do?

Stuart Kerr ● 2051d

SK: ".. are you absolutely sure you're of sound mind?"RC: Yes. At least as sure as anyone can be of himself. (That applies to you, too, btw) SK: ".. have you nothing better to do?"RC: Yes. Which is why I spend the greater part of my waking hours attending to those things.But as for why I spend a small part of my spare time addressing these things, it's fairly straightforward.MB posts numerous bonkers claims about all sorts of conspiracies, many of which don't matter eg Royal family being shape-shifting alien lizards, or Robert Plant being a Satan worshipper.And if he stopped there, it wouldn't bother me. But instead he takes it much further, in two ways.First he insults eg the bereaved and suffering of terrorist attacks which he claims to have been faked - despicable conduct in anyones book.Second, he is perpetuating scandalous lies about the Covid pandemic, in an affort to persuade people that it doesn't exist, or if it does, it is merely a cover for some Illuminati grand design to control us/kill us off by way of 5G microchips planted in vaccines etc.Of course even then, I could ignore all this as the ranting of a deranged mind, except that at best, it can persuade some gullible people to ignore anti-Covid measures, thereby leading to greater transmission. While at worst, it can eg lead to attacks on mast installers, as we've already seen.And so my posts are not for Browns' benefit - there's no persuading his type - but rather to prevent OTHER people from getting sucked down the rabbit hole.And the test I prefer to use to that purpose is The Holocaust. For while some people might be persuaded eg by carefully contrived videos of 9/11, virtually everyone of sound mind accepts the fact of The Holocaust.Meaning that Brown's entire credibility would be shot to pieces if he were only to come out and give a truthful, Yes/No Holocaust answer of the type which you demand of me, but conspicuously decline to ask of him. Now I have two questions of my own for you.Why do you consistently defend him, even when he peddles the most outrageous, offensive and dangerous rubbish, whilst continuing to single me out for contradicting him?Or have you nothing better to do?

Richard Cathcart ● 2051d

.. far too much detail Richard..alas (and reading between your aching words) I suspect the true answer should have been “no” to both...And how many gullible forum posters do you need to protect?One?  ten?  A hundred?And who are they?  Could you name these daft souls you have personally taken to your bosom....You take care dear chap.And try not to get so carried away...

Stuart Kerr ● 2051d

SK: ".. far too much detail Richard.."RC: You might like to pose simplistic, Yes/No questions in order to elicit the answer you require, but don't imagine that the rest of us are too stupid to fall for that trick.SK: "alas (and reading between your aching words) I suspect the true answer should have been “no” to both..."RC: So when you don't get the answers you want, you just invent some. Bully for you.SK: "And how many gullible forum posters do you need to protect?One?  ten?  A hundred?And who are they?  Could you name these daft souls you have personally taken to your bosom...."Unless you are one of them, why should it matter to you? I mean, it doesn't cost you anything to just scroll on by. As I generally do with your posts. (Or at least those which aren't personally attacking me.) SK: "You take care dear chap."Ah, the customary - and transparently insincere - closing valediction. I'm tempted to shout "Kerr Bingo!"P.S. Any chance of your returning the compliment and answering my questions? Or are you just another of those self-satisfied people who demand the right to ask questions of others, but refuse to answer them themselves?You know, like Michael Brown...

Richard Cathcart ● 2051d

Er..  Try very hard to read me clearly Richard.At no stage did I even mildly try to defend my pal Michael Brown.  He sure doesn't need me to do that, besides which I don't read his stuff closely enough to have a clue what he's on about.Neither did I ever try to single you out among those who  contradict Michael.  What I did do was suggest you stop bugging this forum with your ugly obsession of the holocaust because I've plenty enough Jewish blood in my veins to find your line in this context both offensive and ridiculous.  You're largely a one man posse Richard- and every time other posters try reverting to wit you always drag them back to your private nasty.And yes - I do find your invention of “the brownstuff” in reference to Michael's posts both revolting and childish in an ill-educated teenagerish sort of way. You say you are only trying to protect the gullible of W4.  So I repeat, WHO are these gullible twerps on W4.com in need of Richard Cathcart's protection?And is this really what you think of your fellow posters?

Stuart Kerr ● 2051d

Well I for one am not gullible because I am a satanic cabalist forumite.

Chris Blackwell ● 2051d

Cover blown. Dammit!

Simon Temple ● 2051d

SK: "What I did do was suggest you stop bugging this forum with your ugly obsession of the holocaust because I've plenty enough Jewish blood in my veins to find your line in this context both offensive and ridiculous." RC: It was BROWN who, à propos of nothing, introduced The Holocaust to this thread in his post of 15/03/21 00:03:00, when he falsely accused me of being a Denier. Again.I wasn't going to let that one lie on the record unchallenged.(The rest of your post is just your usual ad hominem garbage  - I've better things to do with my time than reply to it)

Richard Cathcart ● 2051d

You wouldn't know an ad hominem attack if it leapt up and bit your balls off...But never mind - just try being nice for a change..eh..

Stuart Kerr ● 2051d

Who's a holocaust denier?

Simon Temple ● 2051d

“Oh and I don't like the way you said "The Everard story used to distract the public" — I do hope you are not suggesting that Sarah Everard's murder was faked”.It’s not a story I’ve followed, and I don’t watch much news nowadays coz it’s full of rubbish and propaganda, but I do still hear and see clips –it’s hard to get away from, especially stories like the Everard one.Firstly, the media reported her missing days prior, and it was big news. People go missing every day, so why was Everard the big story? The story first appeared around the time that the new policing Bill was put forward, which was clearly going to be controversial but got little coverage due to the Everard story – how convenient. The accused is a policeman, someone employed to protect people from such misfortunes, yet the government reaction was to increase ‘protection’ from all the ‘nasty’ men out there, most of which are not policemen, with the cost of the protection costing £millions, investing in more CCTV and plain clothes officers in pubs and clubs - all over this alleged murder? If Johnson had announced 2 weeks ago that he was dramatically increasing surveillance under his new fascist State plans, there would have been uproar, but in the name of protection for women after the Everard story, his plans are welcomed. A few days ago I saw 3 young women, claimed to be friends of Everard, interviewed by the BBC. They all banged on about the need to protect women from all the horrible men out there, yet not a tear or red eye between them – no emotion whatsoever despite their friend having just been chopped up - apparently. The accused is also supposed to have accidentally incurred head injuries in his cell on 2 separate occasions. Really?So, no – I am not suggesting that the Everard murder was faked, and neither do I assume the story to be true.

Michael Brown ● 2046d

Michael — so if I understand you correctly you are telling us that unless you see first hand the chopped up body of Sarah Everard or tmeet her devestaed family then it didn't happen. Unless you met the Manchester bomber for a cuppa before he detonated himself and you saw the bodies first hand it isn't true. Unless you had to jump out of the way of the speeding van on London Bridge it was a staged event. Why is it then that you are prepared to believe the stuff that YOU circulate without having any first hand evidence of that? And I don't mean reading or watching it on the internet, I mean applying the same logic you do to everything else and actually witnessing it? After all, according to you nothing is real unless you have witnessed it. If your entire World view is based on the paranoid ramblings of conspiracy theorists with too much time on their hands and a penchant for over thinking then I suggest you need to get a grip. And do remember that a conspiracy theory is just that: a theory.

Chris Blackwell ● 2045d

Michael Brown does bring to mind those times when I have been told categorically by self opinionated keyboard warriors that certain things and events in my previous life didn't happen, even though I was actually there. MB himself propogated this by suggesting that somebody I had worked with was a Satan worshipper although he later retracted this. It's a pointless argument really but there is a difference between trivial stupidity like that and posting twaddle that may influence others not to wear a mask or not have the jab or ignore social distancing. For somebody who claims that Covid is a cover for the NWO to take away his freedoms MB is going out of his way to ensure that his freedoms ARE taken away due to a further lockdown. In encouraging people not to wear a nask or have the jab he is taking part in a self fulfilling prophecy, but then I am sure the irony is completely lost on him.

Chris Blackwell ● 2045d

Nice to see MCB expressing compassion for the family and friends of Sarah Everard, and not using her tragic death to spread his conspiracy theories. Oh, hang on a minute.........

Richard Greenhough ● 2045d

Vaccine Passports

Michael Brown ● 2039d

Mike - they didn't include the benefits of Newspeak.

Simon Temple ● 2039d