Forum Topic

From my own experience, we'd like to swap our car for a plug in.  Not least because of the tax saving on a company car.However, we don't have a garage or off-street parking, so charging at home is tricky - not impossible, but you're going to find lots of extension cables on the streets until there's kerbside charging in residential areas.At the office in South Acton, pre pandemic, we had 3 people with plug in cars - and we managed that with extension cables and rented parking spaces in the new developments that had charging (about £250 per month per space).We have phase 3 power at the office, and our intention is to put in fast chargers (50-150KWH) to support up to 4 cars at a time. However, we analysed our electricity use and realised we didn't have enough to use the factory and charge the cars at the same time!  Over several months we did a bunch of work to improve our energy use - worthwhile in itself - so we now have more capacity to do rapid charging.We also costed bringing in additional power - it means digging up a street, and the cost is circa £20K - plus the electricity costs.We already used renewable sourced energy, but we'd want to generate our own if we can - we have a flat roof and installing solar panels is an option.  This is a lot of work in order to ensure I and our team can easily charge our cars.I am sure Hounslow will introduce kerbside charging in Chiswick and Ealing are making positive noises about doing it on the South Acton estate.

Ed Saper ● 2069d

Taken from a post on the Acton W3 site:"... in London, air pollution contributes to in excess of 9,400 premature deaths every year, and costs the health system annually between £1.4 billion and £3.7 billion.The main source of this pollution is road vehicles – but it’s not just their exhaust gases. The latest research carried out for the government indicates that dust from brake wear, tyre wear and road surface wear currently constitute over 60% (by mass) of particulate emissions (PM2.5 and PM10) from road transport. These fragments pollute the air and will eventually be washed into rivers and the sea. Electric vehicles do not solve this dust problem and can even make it worse, as they tend to be heavier due to their batteries. Currently no legislation is in place to limit or reduce these particles.So what can be done? Well, apart from walking or cycling instead of driving whenever you can, there’s one very simple thing you can do: Buy the LIGHTEST, smallest car that is sufficient for you. Doing so reduces every type of emission. By contrast, an SUV weighs on average 40% more than a normal car, due to its size and 4-wheel transmission.But there’s worse! Apart from the increased dust due to the extra weight, the International Energy Agency has found that SUVs are the SECOND LARGEST CAUSE of the global rise in carbon dioxide emissions over the past decade, eclipsing all shipping, aviation, heavy industry and even trucks. Each year, SUVs emit 700 mega-tonnes of CO2, about the entire output of the UK and Netherlands combined. On top of all this, studies of accident statistics in the USA found that a far higher percentage of pedestrians hit by SUVs died compared with those hit by a normal car. Having to share the road with 2-ton monsters puts people off buying a small car or cycling – the very things we need to encourage to tackle both air pollution and climate change."http://www.actonw3.com/default.asp?section=community&link=http://appasp.ActonW3.com/server/app/forum/default.asp?site=4I read recently that car manufacturers no longer make much (any?) money on selling regular cars, it's SUV's where the real profits lie, since people are willing to pay a premium for them.Which is why the manufacturers are pushing them so strongly, which in turn encourages demand, which then commands higher prices.

Richard Cathcart ● 2069d

There is just so much misinformation around about EVs, tyre particulates and brake dust.The UK will not require 4 million charging points to cover 32 million cars.  On average an EV will need charged once a week (for many much less), people do not charge all at the same time and many people will charge from home over night.  The 4 million number quoted is probably 20x or more overstated.The UK grid can easily cope with us all changing to EVs - that is the view of the National Grid who ought to know about these things.EV tyre and brake dust emissions have in general only been modelled.  For some strange reason, researchers do not seem to want to get out into the real world and measure busy streets - or at least they do not want to get out very often.  When you look at actual real world data it seems the modelling is dramatically wrong.  We have real world data for how long brake pads last on EVs - it is 5x-10x longer than the equivalent ICE vehicle.  On tyre particulates, EVs are heavier than ICE cars so will go through tyres quicker, but as yet it is unclear by how much because of different driving styles.  But when researchers actually measured pollution at Blackwall tunnel, tyre particulates were around 1% of all particulates (other researchers got 12-13% at Marylebone HS).  So whilst it is important to reduce tyre particulates, and a different design of tyre could help, this is not a major issue.Batteries degrade relatively slowly, with the exception of early generation Nissan Leafs where Nissan got the design badly wrong.  EV batteries typically have an 7-8 year or 100,000 mile warranty with them. The real world data we have suggests that an EV battery will still have 70% of its capacity after 12-15 years potentially longer which is far longer than the typically ownership period of a car.  Even then EV batteries do not need to be recycled but can be used for other things. I do not have an EV, but I am convinced an EV will be my next car in a few years time

Justin Stephenson ● 2069d