Forum Topic

Bobby Osborne: "[Trump's claims] could justifiably be taken with a pinch of salt. But when Sidney Powell makes those accusations they have credibility,The media stupidly reported that she had been sacked from Trumps legal team when the reality is she is acting independently focusing on the Dominion Fraud."The Journal of the American Bar Association:"Despite her early accomplishments, [Powell's] lawsuits alleging fraud in Georgia and Michigan drew derision for typos and lack of evidence to support her claims of massive election fraud, Newsweek reports.The Georgia and Michigan suits misspelled “district” in the top lines, and the Michigan suit misspelled the name of a key expert witness.The suits amplified Powell’s claims at a press conference and interviews that ballot fraud was enabled by software made by Dominion Voting Systems. Powell had claimed that voting machines had been rigged, and Republican officials in Georgia were part of the scam. After her assertions, the Trump campaign distanced itself from Powell, saying she is 'practicing law on her own'."https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/meet-sidney-powell-the-conspiracy-minded-lawyer-who-vowed-to-release-the-kraken-in-election-suitsSo there you have it, even Trump is pushing Powell to one side with the Presidential Bargepole, but you reckon she's "credible".You know, a woman who, but for googling some nutjob website the other day, you wouldn't have recognised had she bumped into you on the street and dislodged your tinfoil hat.(I think the word you were looking for was "incredible". Literally)

Richard Cathcart ● 2157d

Hi Bobby,If you never said that Trump was going to win then I misinterpreted/misread what you wrote. It's certainly the impression I had (that Trump was going to win) from the posts of yours on the subject that I recall reading. I haven't/didn't read them to a 'forensic' standard. I seem to remember someone writing Trump is going to win big (or something along those lines) on the date of the election, which made my heart sink, but I don't recall who wrote it, and the search function on this forum isn't very good, so unless I've got time on my hands I'm not going to check who that person was. I have a suspicion it might have been you, but it's just that - a suspicion.You said you are a professional gambler - and by the sounds of it, a successful one. Good for you. Having played with shares many years ago I recognise what you say about using your brain rather than relying on emotions. Emotions only work if you support Leicester City!However, as you are aware, I remain highly sceptical about all these allegations of election fraud, servers being seized by force in Germany, soldiers being killed etc. bandied about by those I would call 'conspiracy theorists.'To me so many things don't add up. Just one thing - there is so much focus on Dominion voting servers, and I've seen reference to Chavez and Venezuela - Chavez has been dead for years, so presumably the news that the conspiracy theorists are bandying about the servers being easily manipulated has been widely 'known' for years - yet the US are still using this system for their election?To me, all the pre-election talk of fraud was from the Trump side to set the stage for trying to overturn the result of the presidential election that they thought was turning against them.But like you, I will wait and see.

Andrew Jones ● 2156d

No No No ..With online betting you could back Trump at 32-1 as I did last month and cash out at any time. Now the odds are 18-1 so you can take the profit. The race doesn’t have to finish.In a lifetime of gambling on dogs, horses, football playing blackjack in casinos etc I have never experienced anything like this opportunity.The only platform currently taking my bets is Betfair.Paddy Power,  Bet 365 and others all settled their bets and paid out on Biden after the media called the election. Big Mistake! (Also a schoolboy error by Boris congratulating the loser!)I can’t believe how moronic those bookies were and they will lose hundreds of millions if Trump pulls this off. That’s because they are out of their intellectual comfort zone.I believe Trump will win in the Supreme Court as I have researched the US Constitution but wouldn’t put my house on it and estimate it at 50/50 given the Chinese involvement. But even if the kiddy fiddler gets in before Harris cancels him I still win.I had a gambler in Alabama calling me a liar and didn’t believe I got 32-1 in the U.K. when he is getting 2-1 on Trump across the pond. I showed him the screen shots as I have to other people.Having said that I don’t advise anyone to follow my strategy..If you want to see for yourself open an online account and put £10 on Trump to become next President. Then press the cash out button when and if the odds go down as events unfold as i expect. 14 December may be the deadline for this.Or go into a high street bookies and write out a slip for £1 but you won’t have the cash out option, When the US election is resolved I will deconstruct the Covid 19 hoax for you.Be Lucky!

bobby osborne ● 2147d

sorry lads, been having a few problems logging in so had to register under a new name but you must work out who I am eh! Now been away a few weeks and all was going nicely, everyone having a good moan about the ongoing debacle that is the the HR traffic and all the road closures, yes agreed, a complete farce. On a personal level, seen a big flight of money moving across to Germany and France from my clients but that has nothing to do with Brexit, not to mention having to cancel my ski holiday and food prices going up etc, no, nothing to do with Brexit, Boris has it all under control, we will be a strong and united nation. And then I see this thread, what's all that about. So Brown3rd who had made a complete idiot of himself about Covid now telling us Trump will remain the President and some other idiot banging on about how much money he has made on the election. Wakey wakey idiots, see you were telling us you backed 11, 15, 18's in big money, so assume that must be you trying to lay it off on betfair in 100k @ 20-1! If you are so convinced of Trump being next President and as you claim to have made so much money being a professional gambler, why don't you put your money where your mouth is Bobby, take £50k @ 19-1, i mean what's 50k for a big successful gambler like yourself eh. See all i can smell is cow dung because i have challenged you to a bet which you have not taken on as have other posters. So come on big gambler, put it on the line, otherwise, i think that cow dung smell is only going to get worse. Oh, one last think, your POA quip is not funny, infact I found it quite offensive, grow up.

James Smith-Jones ● 2147d

OK...  I'll have a nibble Alastair.  If only to spice-up this branch of Bob's mass-debate which is slowly morphing into one of the good old “Gossip” threads... Yes, there WERE a few growls back there.  To be expected with so many crusty old buggers aboard.  Some just haven't the imagination to understand that a few gamblers really do make money.I've a close mate, a multi-millionaire who owns an 8 bedroom mansion in 7 acres between Winchester and Southampton.  An occasional actor but a full time pro gambler.  Twenty odd years ago he rang me one night to do him a favour and place a bet.  The following morning a motorbike arrived with a parcel full of cash and instructions.  I was to take a cab over to Clapham somewhere and lay this complicated bet with a specific bookie.  All the horses were at odds NOT to finish. The following day my mate turned up and drove me back to the scene of crime, where we picked up about eight thousand quid profit.  Apparently the bookie had got his odds wrong.  I wouldn't know.  But I got a hefty tip and a grand dinner in a Michelin star dive in Covent Garden.Anyway, I don't gamble except on Grand National Day and Cheltenham Gold Cup Day.  Over the years I've had four memorable 100-1 wins at a tenner each way.  Otherwise I'm a born loser.  And happy to know I'm a loser and stay well away.  That's in my blood.  I remember my dad in 1963 straight after the Grand National when Ayala won at 66-1.  He'd been at a dinner the night before with Teasy-Weasy Raymond and had the horses name in his wallet.  But he'd forgotten to lay the bet!Anyway – if you really want to gossip about men...There's a small group of right male bitches who are taking up space on this forum..In common, they all loathe cyclists but claim they don't.  Which is fair enough when it comes to having an opinion.What's not fair enough is they resort to ad-hominem attacks whenever remotely challenged.  But they're so loudmouth aggressive – in a cringing sort of way – that many of our best posters have abandoned ship...So if anyone wants a moan, that's the place to go...

Stuart Kerr ● 2146d

27 Nov - "Serving a warrant on Matt Hancock"28 Nov - "It’s 50 50 who wins right now."30 Nov - "My sources are telling me Trump has won by a landslide"30 Nov - "Theres big news coming out from Georgia soon... This is gonna be biblical trust me!"30 Nov - "There was a firefight at the base in Frankfurt to retrieve the Dominion server. The usual cover up of operatives supposedly dead in a helicopter crash was used. General Flynn back in charge."01 Dec - "Having watched the court hearIngs in Pennsylvania and Arizona with Michigan commencing today I have formed the opinion that the Presidents  lawyers have a smart strategy that gives them multiple paths to winning this election."02 Dec - "Gina Haspel the CIA Director...  ... arrested in Frankfurt and now singing like a canary."09 Dec -  "The Texas lawsuit could be a game changer and Trump now has a realistic chance of winning"10 Dec - "I believe Trump will win in the Supreme Court as I have researched the US Constitution" 11 Dec - "If the Supreme Court accept the Texas case I expect..."12 Dec - "Am I right or am I wrong?"I think we got the answer to that last question a little while later, straight from the horse's arse:"I was surprised the Supreme Court refused to consider the Texas challenge so I got that wrong".Btw, Bobby, where exactly did you research US Constitutional Law?Oxford? Harvard? Google University? Wikipedia College of Further Education? Or your Alma Mater, The David Icke Institute for the Certifiably Insane?Meanwhile:https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cia-director-gina-haspel-ar/fact-checkcia-director-gina-haspel-was-not-arrested-injured-or-found-dead-idUSKBN28E215

Richard Cathcart ● 2145d

BO: "Today’s news typically censored the detail that the 5 swing states ‘called’ their results with caveats concerning the ongoing legal cases."You boast that you have studied US Constitutional Law. But just as one might study eg the hieroglyphics on an ancient Egyptian tomb and still be none the wiser as to what any of it means, it's clear you have no idea what the above means.Let me explain it to you in simple terms.Election officials are subject to the law of the land in discharging their duties. (Obviously)At the time they declared the results, they were aware that Trump and his ("Will Talk Crap For Money") lawyers were going to challenge the results.Therefore they announced the results along with a legal caveat. That in no way amounted to their conceding that the results may be substantially unreliable; rather it merely acknowledged the fact of the impending challenges - a 'tip of the hat', if you like.And as they will doubtless have predicted - they being cognisant of Electoral and Constitutional Law themselves - those legal challenges haven't amounted to a hill of beans.In fact, many haven't even got as far as a hearing, either at federal or state level, and even in Republican controlled Courts. While those which have been heard have been dismissed as being entirely without merit.My personal favourite was the unanimous verdict of the (Republican majority) Supreme Court on Trump's attempt to have the result of the key swing state of Pennsylvania overturned:"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied."https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/120820zr_bq7d.pdfYep, that was it, eighteen words.The legal equivalent of "Oh why don't you all stop wasting everyones time and just sod off, you pathetic bunch of morons?"

Richard Cathcart ● 2143d

.The electoral college votes will be sealed and sent by special carrier to Washington where they will remain until January 6th when the House and Senate will come into a joint session to open the votes. The media is going to make you believe that it's all over and Joe Biden is now officially president...On January 6th, Nancy Pelosi will sit down with the rest of the House members as she has no special power or authority over the hearing... Vice President Mike Pence will have all the authority as president of the Senate for that day and will accept or reject motions to decide the next steps by the assembly. Mike Pence is in full authority that day as written in the Constitution. The ballots will be certified today but that means nothing... The votes will be opened and at that point one House member could, and most likely will, raise their hand to object to the Vice President on the state of elector's votes.  That objection could cover fraud or any other reason, and with the seconding of that objection everything changes. Everything!!The House and Senate will divide for two hours (at least) to debate, then vote. The vote will be per Senator with the Vice President being the deciding vote if needed in the Senate, while the vote in the House will be only be ONE vote per delegation, per state, not per House member!!!  The Republicans have 30 delegation votes compared to the Democrats 20 delegation votes. If this scenario runs true, President Trump gets re-elected. The Democrats, the media, social networks and globalists around the world will come unhinged and chaos will erupt.

bobby osborne ● 2143d

[quote=Wisbech Eagle;3583580][i]How tediously predictable this reply is! It's full of the anticipated cliches, misunderstandings and jingoism.[/i]Wow, you can read my mind Wishy![i]Empire has everything to do with it! Not during the days of Empire itself but because it's part of a continuum which leads from yesterday, through today and onto tomorrow. We ruled half the world and that half thought of us as home. We gave the world it's international language. Through independence, national pride has grown, but we are still regarded by many as where they want to be. [b]We made commitments, which emotionally still matter.[/b] [/i]Bollocks we did. We left the countries we ruled better off and we owe them nothing. We destroyed our empire fighting two wars that were started by others and mostly based on a bunch of lies.[i]With English as their second, or sometimes first language we are where many people target, even if we are often seen as a stepping stone on a passage west. That doesn't account for all of course because we also accept those needing our humanitarian assistance. People that you clearly despise but most of us are proud to be able to help. We don't "always" do it! We play our part, as we should. [/i]The only people I despise are people like you that dictate mass immigration onto a majority that don't want it. I want human bio diversity and a continuation of distinct cultures not global homogeneity. I also want my children to be safe and have a homeland of their own. Everyone should be entitled to that. [i]You don't care about our reputation for honest dealing and fairness? Shame on you. I do. From a practical point of view our trustworthiness is one of our only remaining bankable assets. Playing dirty with people's lives is a pretty efficient way to destroy that. Which is why cutting the foreign aid budget is madness. [/i]What's fair about UK taxpayers paying money to foreign governments that are largely corrupt when we have huge numbers of our own people sleeping on the streets or in poverty?[i]Train our own workers! That old mantra! If only it were that simple. Our unemployment rate varies but remove the unemployable and there is no-where near enough slack to provide what we need if we are to [b]sustain a growing economy[/b], and grow we must to be able to repay the huge debts we are running up. We don't have the education system or the adult training places available and it would take decades to turn that around. Do it and then more UK workers could move up a stratum so we would then need immigration to fill the jobs they were doing. We need cleaners. We need carers. Just as much as we need doctors and lawyers. [/i]We are running up huge debs because we have a welfare state that's trying to cater for huge numbers of people that are not English. Not only are these people a huge net drain on our economy but to add insult to injury remittances (mostly benefits money wired "home") sustains large parts of economies like Somalia.  [i]The "we want the country of our forefathers back" argument is pathetic. My Dad would not have wanted it back. He would have wanted us to progress and face the modern world, and not hide from it like a coward.[/i] Your little acorn didn't fall far from the tree then. We had a supersonic airliner back in the 60's yet since mass immigration all we have is phone that spies on us and cities that all look the same filled with people that don;t give a shit about each other. How is that progress?  [i]The constant references to "mass" immigration is a red herring. What's important is what we are doing now and whether it matches our needs and responsibilities. What happened in the past is done. It needs to be managed for sure but [b]it now must be accepted[/b] and [b]not allowed[/b] to dominate. Living in the past is a pointless exercise. [/i]There goes your actual liberalism shining throughOh and here is the Dominion voting system in all it's glory:https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_%5B121320%5D_v2_%5Bredacted%5D.pdfThere are videos of the Machine in operation and some of the shocking ways it can be used to manipulate elections but the "liberals" at YouTube have taken them down. [/quote]

Bryan Turner ● 2142d

Right now POTUS is sitting on a stack of Trump cards.He has court cases still pending that will go to the Supreme Court and thanks to the Texas case, his lawyers now know how to file it under article 3 not 2 so it will force them to hear it. He has the DNI report coming. Barr steps down on the 23rd (can now be a witness—he did his job). Durham is a special counsel (can prosecute in any state). He’s letting civil, criminal, federal courts fail to handle the situation properly so he can use military tribunals. He has the data (all of it) from NSA, the Kraken supercomputer, the Alice supercomputer, (and probably a couple others i haven’t heard about yet). He has the dueling electors from 7 states legislatures. He has VP Pence as final arbiter of which ballots to accept. He has the Insurrection Act, the NDAA, the national emergency, the 14th amendment, the 2018 executive order, the 2017 very first EO, the Patriot Act, the FISA warrants, the Declassification of everything, people swearing affidavits by the 1000s, Wikileaks just dropped a ton and Assange will be pardoned so he can talk about Seth Rich.Now that the governors and secretary of states certified and Biden accepted, they committed and knowingly agreed to treason. Solar Winds just raided and Dominion closing up shop. Same with politicians and media. He has the CIA servers used to change Dominion machines, he will soon have access to the machines too. Biden hasn’t accepted any transition money nor has Harris given up her seat. The military has infiltrated Antifa and BLM.He knows which politicians took Chinese and Soros money. He wrote an EO in the military line of succession.He is defunding the CIA. He just replaced Kissinger and Allbright on the National Security Advisory Board with his loyalists.The military has been flying more planes over America. The Navy just parked huge fleets on both coasts. The 82nd is preparing for an operation (same group Flynn and Donoghue belonged to). Things are falling into place. He has it all. He is just laying out the case, building the narrative. He knows he won and they cheated. He gave them the chance to fix things. They chose not to. Now they all go down.

bobby osborne ● 2140d

(The other one must be an halibut)Praline: (whistles a bit, then) Hello. I would like to buy a fish license, pleasePostal clerk: A what?Praline: A license for my pet fish, EricClerk: How did you know my name was Eric?Praline: No, no, no! My fish's name is Eric. Eric fish. He's an halibutClerk: What?Praline: He is an halibutClerk: You've got a pet halibut?Praline: Yes, I chose him out of thousands. I didn't like the others, they were all too flatClerk: You must be a loonyPraline: I am not a loony. Why should I be tarred with the epithet 'loony' merely because I have a pet halibut? I've heard tell that Sir Gerald Nabarro has a pet prawn called Simon - you wouldn't call him a loony! Furthermore Dawn Pathorpe, the lady show jumper, had a clam called Stafford, after the late chancellor. Alan Bullock has two pikes, both called Chris, and Marcel Proust had an 'addock! So if you're calling the author of 'A la recherche de temps perdu' a loony, I shall have to ask you to step outside!Clerk: All right, all right, all right. A license?Praline: Yes!Clerk: For a fishPraline: Yes!Clerk: You *are* a loonyPraline: Look, it's a bleeding pet, isn't it? I've got a license for me pet dog Eric, I've got a license for me pet cat EricClerk: You don't need a license for your catPraline: I bleedin' well do and I've got one! Can't be caught out there!Clerk: There is no such thing as a bloody Cat licensePraline: Yes there isClerk: No there isn'tPraline: Is!Clerk: Isn't!Praline: Is!Clerk: Isn't!Praline: Is!Clerk: Isn't!Praline: Is!Clerk: Isn't!Praline: Is!Clerk: Isn't!Praline: Is!Clerk: Isn't!Praline: What's that then?Clerk: This is a dog license with the word 'dog' crossed out and 'cat' written in, in crayonPraline: Man didn't have the right formClerk: What man?Praline: The man from the cat detector vanClerk: The loony detector van, you meanPraline: Look, it's people like you what cause unrestClerk: What cat detector van?Praline: The cat detector van from the Ministry of HousingeClerk: Housinge?Praline: It was spelt like that on the van. I'm very observant. I never seen so many bleedin' aerials. The man said their equipment could pinpoint a purr at four hundred yards, and Eric being such a happy cat was a piece of cakeClerk: How much did you pay for this?Praline: Sixty quid and eight for the fruit-batClerk: What fruit-bat?Praline: Eric the fruit-batClerk: Are all your pets called Eric?Praline: There's nothing so odd about that. Kemel Attaturk had an entire menagerie called AbdulClerk: No he didn'tPraline: Did!Clerk: Didn't!Praline: Did, did, did, did, did and did!Clerk: Oh all rightPraline: Spoken like a gentleman, sir. Now, are you going to give me a fish license?Clerk: I promise you that there is no such thing. You don't need oneNB: The TV Version continues.....the album version continues belowPraline: Then I would like a statement to that effect signed by the Lord Mayor(Fanfare of trumpets. Mayor gorgeously dressed with dignitaries enters flanked by trumpeters.)Clerk: You're in luck(In long shot now. The Mayor, who is nine foot high, and dignitaries approach a startled Praline. Organ music below a reverent voice over)********** TV Version finishes - continuation of Album Version **********Praline: In that case give me a bee licenseClerk: A license for your pet beePraline: CorrectClerk: Called Eric? Eric the bee?Praline: NoClerk: No?Praline: No, Eric the half bee. He had an accidentClerk: You're off your chumpPraline: Look, if you intend by that utilization of an obscure colloquialism to imply that my sanity is not up to scratch, or even to deny the semi-existence of my little chum Eric the half bee, I shall have to ask you to listen to this. Take it away, Eric the orchestra-leader

Richard Cathcart ● 2124d

BO: "[Trump's claims] could justifiably be taken with a pinch of salt. But when Sidney Powell makes those accusations they have credibility,The media stupidly reported that she had been sacked from Trumps legal team when the reality is she is acting independently focusing on the Dominion Fraud."She's certainly focusing all her time and attention on Dominion now, that's for sure!Dominion Voting Systems on Friday filed a defamation lawsuit against attorney Sidney Powell for what they say is her role in orchestrating a "demonstrably false" conspiracy theory about the Colorado-based voting machine company rigging the 2020 presidential election. "She has directly accused Dominion of fraud, election rigging, bribery, and conspiracy, which are serious crimes," the company wrote in its complaint filed in D.C. federal court. "Powell's statements have exposed Dominion to the most extreme hatred and contempt."The suit, which is seeking nearly $1.3 billion in damages, accuses Powell of leading a pervasive campaign to spread false election theories that gained currency with President Donald Trump.Powell could not be reached for comment. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/voting-machine-company-sues-pro-trump-attorney-sidney-powell-for-false-claims/ar-BB1cAAR5If anyone's still up for a laugh in these turbulent times, I suggest taking a moment to read the rest of that article.But if not, I'll leave you with this little gem:"Some of Powell's most far-fetched theories alleged the company was created in Venezuela by deceased dictator Hugo Chavez, the complaint said."Comedy Gold!

Richard Cathcart ● 2119d