Forum Topic

The sarcasm is unnecessary and a pretty transparent attempt to deflect from an important issue.With your TfL associations you may know people on the project team or actually have worked on it yourself so it is time. as they say, to put on your big boy pants and give this matter some proper consideration.Research into ambulance response times shows for instance that in the case of a cardiac arrest a one minute reduction in the time taken to get to the patient increases their chance of living by 24%The main fact that you have to deal with is that the temporary cycle lane has created an extended pinch point between Turnham Green and Turnham Green Terrace in which there is no space for gridlocked traffic to make way for an emergency service vehicle. Badly parked cars or previous traffic jams may have briefly delayed vehicles in the past but never to the extent which I have witnessed recently and numerous others have reported as having seen.Do you dispute that since the cycle lane began construction there has been a significant increase in the average length of time it has taken an emergency service vehicle to travel along this section of the road?If so on what date are you basing this view?Does TfL consider ambulance response times in any cost benefit analysis of safety impact of the measures taken and, if not, why not?What would you consider to be an acceptable increase in the average journey time for an emergency service vehicle for any project you were involved with?

Francis Rowe ● 2173d