Forum Topic

I was following the Covid-19 infection rates for the W4 area quite closely in the weeks after the first flower market. There was no indication it led to any noticeable rise in local infections which remained quite low compared to neighbouring areas.More and more research seems to be suggesting that Covid-19 infection risk is much more limited outdoors.There were failures of organisation at the first event but hopefully lessons have been learned. The organisers need to get out of the mindset that the success of the event is measured by the number of people attending.There is quite a lot of evidence that it provided a boost to many local retailers. The High Road was very busy on the day of the market. The main worry about this Sunday is transport in my view. There is no District line to Chiswick. One of the people behind the event has made the worryingly complacent claim that very few people drove to the last market because their overflow car park wasn't used. As anyone living within walking distance of the High Road will have told them, ample use was made of the free parking available on residential streets much nearer the event than the paid for parking. A significant number of people drove to the last market and an even higher proportion will use their cars to get to this one because of the lack of a tube service.The Acton Lane closure is expected to still be in place on Sunday at the moment so traffic is going to be bad anyway. It might be a good idea for the organisers to request a suspension of the Turnham Green Terrace restriction for a day to mitigate the situation.

Paul Corcoran ● 2194d

Firstly I must congratulate the Flower Market organisers on their initial publicity campaign to launch the enterprise, something I know a little about myself albeit more hot metal than dot com. Good job.As a result unfortunately the ’on the ground’ side of the equation didn’t match up and as a result they were overwhelmed by the numbers of people attending. Fair enough, that’s what can happen when you are still on a steep learning curve.Should it go ahead? Well it’s probably too late to cancel it now anyway and I suspect most sensible people will think twice before attending this time so let see how things go.What I find dumfounding is the utterances from some  local leaders.  Extracts below.Curran is quoted as saying, “It’s great news to hear that a Covid-secure way has been found for it to go ahead in November,Leader of Chiswick’s Conservative councillors Gerald McGregor added, “Given the precautions being put in place, the market will be safe and well organised.”“Corvid secure,” “ the market will be safe”  ......What?Both those sentiments are, to put it mildly, misleading. Nowhere is secure or safe, safer maybe.A more honest approach from them would be to say, we have done our best to make as safe as we can but there is still risk, a risk that we are unable and unqualified to quantify.To be fair one of the founders, Bridget Osborne, has said she is confident that our Corvid preparations are amongst the best which is some cold comfort I suppose but very different from what the two council members have said. SHOP ‘TILL YOU DROP FOLKS! (Sorry, that’s a little callous of me I know)PS If you are reading this Councillor McGregor I mostly like the cut of your jib  but this time I do think you have erred.

Adrian Irving ● 2193d

What I find astounding is that the study, by Imperial College London, says "the pace of the epidemic is accelerating and estimates the number of people infected is now doubling every nine days." Yet Hounslow's Kelly O’Neill, Director of Public Health, ignores all this and gives the thumbs up for the mass gatherings at the flower market to go ahead! What a  hypocrite. On the one hand she is on social media  telling people how to be careful and avoid spreading the virus and on the other hand she approves this money making event. "Prof Steven Riley said he was "really disappointed" when the data started coming in and said it meant the "current measures are not sufficient". Source: BBC James Gallagher, Health and Science Correspondent " Covid-19 is now spreading fastest in the London, according to the latest official estimates.The ‘R rate’ — the rate of spread of infection — has catapulted to a best estimate of 2.9 in London, the highest rate in the country. And Hounslow is in the top four worst infected Boroughs. Which part of this does Kelly O'Neill or Steve Curran not understand?But hey, she asserts that hand sanitiser is to be provided at the entrance and at all stalls and marshalls will be monitoring compliance of these new arrangements throughout the day of the event. Wow - 'monitoring'!  I love that word. It must be comforting to people to know that their death is being monitored.  Hopefully all responsible people will stay away from this event if the Hounslow Director of Public Health and the Leader of the Council are acting so incredibly irresponsibly whilst several European Capital Cities are going into full lockdown.

Steve Taylor ● 2192d