This consultation feels potentially unrepresentative to me.As far as I can see all responses are anonymous to participants, except to Commonplace software house and perhaps LBH as the initiator.You can only agree with (like) submissions, but not disagree (not like!) them, which could be used to create a biased picture.As well as Jo Public, submissions could be made by developers, planners and officers or councillors. They can only be boosted by "agrees" and not countered by "disagrees" and responders cannot know who is making the suggestions or proposals.Here on this forum anonymity is not allowed, we know who is posting and anyone can disagree, and usually does! I wish it was the same for this consultation.Anyone agree?Have I missed something, or misunderstood how it works?
Jeff Gear ● 2248d