Forum Topic

Zoe, you are obviously coming to this late so I am wondering what else you may not have been informed about. Do you know that the Council was intending to move forward with a full consultation on planned measures until, a few weeks ago, the government issued statutory guidance from the DfT to Councils demanding that they install temporary post-Covid Exceptional Traffic Order measures to reallocate road space away from cars to walking and cycling and to reduce traffic volumes in residential and shopping streets? All funding for these measures is dependent on Councils following the new guidelines which are to implement and then consult for a period of up to six months.  Temporary measures can be removed, changed or made permanent as a result of this consultation. Funding for permanent measures will be dependent on the funding having been provided for the temporary measures in the first place. In other words if the Council defied the statutory guidance from the government and did what you are petitioning them to do then there will not be any money for any traffic reduction measures in Grove Park. We will watch the 8300 vehicles per day on Grove Park Bridge creep inexorably upwards to 10,000+; I and many other parents will continue to run the gauntlet taking my kids across Grove Park Terrace from St Mary's Grove to get them to school while speeding cars race up the road; cars will continue to race through Staveley Road at 40mph+; the residents of Burnaby Gardens, St Mary's Grove and Wolseley Gardens will continue to suffer from the noise and air pollution from the Harvard Hill rat run; the Grove Park Piazza will not go ahead because there will be no money and because 1000s of cars are using Grove Park Road and Cavendish Road every day endangering pedestrians and rendering the piaza plans pointless. If you are fully aware that nothing will happen in the next few years at least to increase safety and reduce traffic in Grove Park if your petition is successful and you are comfortable with that then fine you are of course entitled to your view. But if not then please reconsider what you are asking for here and push for proper consultation and for residents voices to be heard in the order in which the DfT is demanding i.e. after implementation of temporary measures.

Paul Campbell ● 2337d

Susan,Richard has linked to the statutory guidance. Here is the letter from the DfT to Councils. I draw your attention in particular to the paragraph outlining the timeline of four weeks to start work following receipt of funds, the clawback clause, references to ETOs and to second funding tranche. In other words if you don't do the work now you won't get any money.Emergency Active Travel Funding Indicative AllocationsDepartment for Transport Great Minster House33 Horseferry Road LondonSW1P 4DRTel: 0300 330 3000Web Site: www.gov.uk/dftOur Ref: Your Ref:28 May 2020On behalf of the Department of Transport, I am pleased to give details of the indicative allocations for the first tranche of the emergency active-travel fund announced on 9 May. This new funding is designed to help you use pop-up and temporary interventions to create an environment that is safe for both walking and cycling in your boroughs. Active travel allows people to get around whilst maintaining social distance and will have an essential role to play in helping us avoid overcrowding on public transport systems as we begin to open up parts of our economy. We have a window of opportunity to act now to embed walking and cycling as part of new long-term commuting habits and reap the associated health, air quality and congestion benefits.Of the total £250 million fund, £225 million will be provided directly to local transport authorities and London boroughs, while £25 million will help support cycle repair schemes.The £225 million allocated to combined and local authorities will be released in two phases. The first tranche of £45 million will be released as soon as possible so that work can begin at pace onLondon’s indicative share of the £225m will be £25 million over the rest of the financial year, with £5 million in the first tranche. This takes into account the fact that TfL has recently had its own separate funding settlement from the Department, £55 million of which is to be spent on active travel measures on both TfL and borough roads. The indicative allocations are in addition to this £55 million and the Department expects that the measures supported by this additional £25 million will be closely coordinated with TfL’s active travel investment programme.For the first tranche of funding, the Department has indicatively allocated a sum of £100,000 to each individual borough and the balance of £1.7m to Transport for London. This is to speed up the process of individual boroughs receiving an appropriate share of the funding, and also recognises the fact that allocating the funding by a formula based on public transport usage by those resident in each borough (as we have done for the rest of the country) would lead to some anomalies in London. It also recognises that TfL has recently had its own separate funding settlement from the Department, part of which is to be spent on active travel measures on both TfL and borough roads.The amounts are only indicative. To receive any money under this or future tranches, boroughs and TfL will need to satisfy the Department that there are swift and closing roads to through traffic, installing segregated cycle lanes and widening pavements.1meaningful plans in place to reallocate road space to cyclists and pedestrians, including on strategic corridors.The quickest and cheapest way of achieving this will normally be point closures. These can be of certain main roads (with exceptions for buses, access and for disabled people, and with other main roads kept free for through motor traffic); or of parallel side streets, if sufficiently direct to provide alternatives to the main road. Point closures can also be used to create low-traffic filtered neighbourhoods.Pop-up segregated cycle lanes will also be funded, but are likely to be more difficult to implement quickly. As the guidance states, they must use full or light segregation. We will also fund the swift implementation, using temporary materials, of existing cycle plans that involve the meaningful reallocation of road space.We expect all these measures to be delivered quickly using temporary materials, such as barriers and planters. Elaborate, costly materials will not be funded at this stage. Anything that does not meaningfully alter the status quo on the road will not be funded.As the guidance makes clear, 20mph zones can form part of a package of measures, but will not be sufficient on their own.If work has not started within four weeks of receiving your allocation under this tranche of funding, or has not been completed within eight weeks of starting, the Department will reserve the right to claw the funding back by adjusting downwards a future grant payment to your authority. This is also likely to have a material impact on your ability to secure any funding in tranche 2.To allow changes to be put in place more quickly, a temporary process for new emergency traffic orders was announced on 23 May halving the time needed for approval.The second tranche of £180m will be released later in the summer to enable authorities to install further, more permanent measures to cement cycling and walking habits.In order to access a share of this funding, we will require the completion of an online proforma to allow us to assess your plans on how the money will be spent. The proforma is intended to be as simple and light-touch as possible and should not be onerous for you to complete. The proforma for tranche one should be completed as soon as possible and no later than Friday 5 June. It can be found online here: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/ActiveTravelFund/. We will write to you again shortly with instructions on how to access the second tranche of funding, together with a new proforma.We will make the payments via a grant under section 31 of the Local Government Act 2003 together with a formal grant determination letter as soon as possible after you have submitted the proforma. In the event that any borough does not wish to receive a share of the funding or does not submit proposals which meet the Department’s expectations, we will reserve the right to decrease indicative allocations and reallocate the funding elsewhere. If you have any questions on any aspect of this funding, please email: activetravel.pmo@dft.gov.uk    2Yours faithfully, Rupert FurnessDeputy Director, Active and Accessible Travel

Paul Campbell ● 2337d

Whilst I will be inconvenienced by some of the proposals there is a lot of good ideas in the proposals but, and unfortunately this is a very big but, there does seem to be a serious lack of joined up thinking by the Council - no real surprise there.As a regular user of Sutton Court Road it has long been the case that, particularly on Friday afternoons, there is a serious traffic jam problem.  The A4 lights are usually on short cycle then and the traffic backs up from the junction to the town hall on the north side and from the junction back to railway bridge on the south side.  Any other hold up and the traffic backs up further potentially all the way to CHR.Hounslow Council have made 2 proposals which impact on Sutton Court Road but clearly have not considered the combined effect.  In the first proposals it has been suggested that the Dukes Avenue junction with A4 is closed (reducing the rat run) and in the South Chiswick proposals there is a suggestion of changing the lights to provide more time for cyclists and pedestrians.  The first suggestion if implemented will increase the amount of traffic using Sutton Court Road to get to the A4 and the second proposal will slow down the flow of traffic.  The combination will therefore result in more and longer traffic jams, which will make the E3 bus timetable a lottery (we know from past experience this results in 20+ min gaps between buses) which in turn severely negatively impacts on the likelihood of people shopping on TGR if the proposals for that are implemented.All of this is completely obvious to anyone who lives in the Sutton Court Road/Dukes Avenue area but clearly not to traffic consultants

Justin Stephenson ● 2337d