Forum Topic

I see that the UK has entered another 938 COVID-19 deaths on Weds 8th April compared to 333 entered by Germany. Let’s look at the total stats for these two countries to date:Germany - Total Cases: 113,296    Total Deaths:  2,349  (2%)    UK - Total Cases:  60,733  Total Deaths:  7,097  (11.6%)Is our NHS really what it’s cracked up to be or is something else going on? Only Italy’s figures are worse at 12.6%.  We’re being told that we’re cared so much about that we need to be locked up for our own good. We’re also being told that bus drivers are dying of COVID-19. If so, surely bus drivers need to be taken off the roads. The same goes with supermarket staff who must be equally at risk, as must be shoppers who visit the stores; so why haven’t these people been relieved of duty and the army called in to deliver us food parcels? Why is there no care for off licence staff? Why are teams of 5G installers not cared about? You can’t sit in the middle of a field on your own but all of these other things that do pose risks are allowed to continue. Why? The answer is simple – they don’t care about any of us; the lockdown is in place purely to ‘fit in’ with the enforced shutdown of businesses – there’s no other way of doing it; therefore, the reasons given for our house arrest has absolutely nothing to do with health and safety, and everything to do with the destruction of the economy, which the government shows no concern for whatsoever. How long will the lockdown last? We, the general public don’t know, but I suspect that the government has known from the beginning, and is just playing this out. They’re threatening increased restrictions, but I’m not sure that they will bring these in; not too soon anyway, as this could backfire due to public restlessness and the affects over too long a period; so if they do, I think it will likely be close to the ‘half way’ point of their already determined lockdown period, in order to give a feeling of an incremental rise, which allows the government to then provide a similar incremental exit term, which will likely be more acceptable to the public thus providing the government with the required time to destroy the economy. Whatever the lockdown term is, the exit will be made to appear to match declining coronavirus cases, but I believe they can control these numbers however they wish. Even if we get to zero cases, an outbreak of COVID-19, or the perception of, will likely always be an option. 

Michael Brown ● 2400d

It’s been reported, today (BBC of all places), that over 90% of UK deaths where ‘COVID-19’ has been mentioned on the death certificate, have been of those with underlying health conditions. Figures also show that deaths from heart disease, respiratory and other non-communicable disease are massively down on those registered in previous years hence UK death rates recorded this year between weeks 1 & 13 are on par with the average for the previous 5 years, so clearly ‘COVID-19’ is being reported as the cause of death at every opportunity, when a person actually died of something else. Factor in the fact that the majority of people said to have died from ‘COVID-19’ are elderly, we can now see that the chances of a healthy young or middle aged person dying of ‘COVID-19’ are close to zero. The figures coming from countries without a lockdown also tell us that we’d be far healthier without a lockdown, so the option exists to improve things even further for UK residents. This is becoming increasing important as week 14 figures show a steep rise in UK deaths compared to those of previous years, as the negative effects of lockdown begin to take hold.On this same day, Prof Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London, who is advising the government using ‘science’, has stated that social distancing is required until a vaccine is found. He’s also suggesting ongoing testing and contact tracing. The government is also expected to announce later today that the lockdown will be extended.It’s as clear as day what a sham and scam all this is - the evidence is overwhelming; not what the forum shills want to read, I know. Richard Dustcart (mouth) must already be regretting his retirement from this amazingly informative and revealing thread of mine – a thread for the people.

Michael Brown ● 2392d

It becomes increasingly difficult to tolerate Michael Brown when four of my friends have been admitted to ICU with CV-19, one of them dying from it. None of them had pre-existing conditions. It is very dangerous for fruit loops like Michael to be allowed a platform to spout their theories, after all he speaks eloquently and his bullshit appears grounded in scientific fact. Doubtless there are those who might read his posts and agree with them without asking where his evidence comes from but for these people it doesn't matter because everything that is posted on YouTube and The Interweb is 100% true.MB is a man who thinks it is fine to clamber aboard his kayak and paddle about on the river with no regard to what might happen should he get into difficulty and need rescuing / hospital treatment thus bringing him into contact with others and potentially putting them at risk. He claims that CV-19 is a hoax when people I know have died from it. His thoughts and actions are in stark contrast to those of us who are staying in and avoiding contact because we understand this is how the spread of CV-19 will stop. His superior air and the thinly veiled condescension in his replies suggest that HE alone has all the answers and is somehow privy to a worldwide plot to enslave us all without once questioning his own validity or sources.And of course to him we are all sheeple and shills ...I saw a video of an American woman leaving church recently and the interviewer asked her how she felt about being in a confined space with so many other people. "I'm fine, I am covered in the blood of Christ!" she replied, seemingly oblivious to the fact that she might herself be a CV-19 carrier who could infect others. But she was all bloody so that was okay.I'm not sure why Michael Brown is allowed to continue posting his drivel but I genuinely think he should be blocked / banned / told to go away. Mind you I have thought this ever since his highly offensive theories on this forum (cited as fact by MB) concerning 9/11, the Manchester Arena bombing and London Bridge.I try hard to avoid his posts but find myself actively searching them out, bit like rubber necking a road accident. Enough now though, surely?

Chris Blackwell ● 2391d

So the likes of Brown should be permitted to go on telling outright lies, regardless of the consequences, should he?We've already had scumbags sabotaging 5G equipment outside a hospital following ranting by the likes of Brown, and here is another example from across the pond (where Brown gets a lot of his crap), which merely took it to the next step:"A woman who claimed the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax was sentenced to five months in prison after she pleaded guilty to threatening a 6-year-old victim’s father.Lucy Richards, 57, pleaded guilty to one count of sending threats through interstate communications, according to the Washington Post. Richards admitted to sending the father a message that read, “LOOK BEHIND YOU IT IS DEATH.”Prosecutors alleged that Richards left voicemails and emails to the Sandy Hook shooting victim’s father last January. However, three of the four charges initially brought against Richards were dismissed as part of the plea deal.Richards is part of a group of people who believe the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax used to push support for gun control, despite there being no evidence for such claims, the Post noted."https://time.com/4810828/sandy-hook-shooting-lucy-richards-threats/And here's another one, following the same massacre:"A Florida professor was fired this week after initiating a years-long campaign claiming the Sandy Hook massacre was a hoax and harassing the family of a victim he believes never existed.James Tracy, who teaches Culture of Conspiracy at Florida Atlantic University, launched his own conspiracy theory in the aftermath of Sandy Hook three years ago, based on conflicting media reports from the day of shooting that lead him to question whether it happened at all.As part of the bizarre theory, Tracy allegedly began harassing the parents of six-year-old Noah Pozner - one of 20 children in the attack by shooter Adam Lanza - demanding proof that the child ever existed.Tracy was finally sent a termination letter from the university this week."https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3363639/Florida-professor-fired-bizarre-Sandy-Hook-hoax-theory-harassing-victim-s-family-child-existed.htmlAnd if you type "Sandy Hook Massacre" into the search box on this forum, Brown has written 14 of the 16 posts on the first page of responses. It is no surprise that he believes that that massacre never happened either.So yeah, you carry on speaking up for his freedom to speak, whilst he goes on following and encouraging scum like those two random examples cited above.Whilst all the while he doubtless sees you as just another one of "the sheeple".

Richard Cathcart ● 2391d