Forum Topic

The problem with not expanding Heathrow is the changing pattern of world trade and the direction this country is now committed to take economically.The percentage by value of this country's exports by value that now go out through Heathrow is currently 40% This reflects the changing nature of trade to include more smaller, higher value products like tech and pharma. In the short term the legal problems for Heathrow work to Boris Johnson's advantage because of his past personal statements about the issue. It would have been embarrassing for him if it was given the green light.But once the dust has settled it will soon become apparent that this development is going to be a major headache for the government. The plan for global Britain necessarily means a significant shift to plane carried exports. The arguments about the need to trade more with your neighbours are undermined if your exports are high value and light. We might be tanking our car manufacturing and agriculture industries but that won't matter so much if we are replacing them with industries that can ship by plane making geographic proximity less relevant.However, if Heathrow doesn't expand then our airborne exports also can't expand unless we use a hub airport outside the UK. This is likely to be Charles de Gaulle. Transporting UK goods through CdG is currently pretty trivial as they can clear customs from their UK point of departure but once we leave the single market then the process becomes more complicated. How much more complicated will probably largely depend on how the French (or the Dutch or the Germans) choose to interpret whatever new rules apply but it is unlikely that the speedy facilitation of British trade will be their top priority.If you believe in Brexit but don't want Heathrow to expand you haven't really understood what Brexit is. It can't possibly work if we take the inevitable hit from a decline in trade with Europe and can't make up for the losses with an offsetting increase in business with America and Asia. The government will have no choice but to revisit the third runway soon and probably before the trade talks with the EU start in earnest because without Heathrow our hand becomes markedly weaker and those across the table will be well aware of that.

Francis Rowe ● 2441d

In order to build the third runway two existing immigration detention centres at Harmondsworth and Colnbrook (outside the Borough) will have to be closed and a new one built at Faggs Road (in the Borough) next to the Bedfont recreation ground and allotments. If built the detention centre would be the largest such facility in Europe. The problems that this would create were highlighted in the Conservative Councillors's response to the public consultation on the third runway. They include the loss open fields and of a large number of mature trees, the destruction of recreational gravel paths ideal for wheelchair users and a huge increase in road traffic on the already congested Fagg’s lane.    The proposed site for the new detention centre is on land designated as part of the green belt. In order to build on green belt land Heathrow would have to apply for a development consent order (DCO) and then use a compulsory purchase order to buy the land from Hounslow Council.  Hounslow Council must inform the Secretary of State in the strongest terms that it would not support a DCO to remove the green belt status of the proposed site for the construction of a new detention centre.In a seemingly unconnected exercise Hounslow Council is currently reviewing the status of all green belt land in the borough. Hounslow Council must not to change the green belt status of the proposed site for the new detention centre no matter how much Heathrow offers to pay for it.If the climate emergency strategy recently adopted with cross-party support by Hounslow Council is to mean anything we must for the sake our children and grandchildren act decisively to frustrate Heathrow’s current expansion plans. The Council must only support proposals that are fully complaint with our commitments under the Paris Agreement enshrined under UK Law.

Cllr Sam Hearn ● 2439d