Democracy is Dead in Hounslow as Trust in the Council Plummets
Chiswick Gunnersbury councillor Joanna Biddolph reports back
Cllr Joanna Biddolph
August 24, 2025
Political parachutes prove that democracy is dead in Hounslow
There was much talk about the way Labour selected its councillor candidate for the Cranford by-election, held on Thursday, 21st August (more on that later). Not for them a local selection process with hustings for the final few candidates (which is how we Conservatives select our council candidates). Instead, Labour’s national executive committee imposed its favourite on local members – providing a parachute candidate. A request for a media interview with Brentford Today & TV was denied, with the candidate’s voice not heard beyond the doorstep. The Labour candidate in the Syon and Brentford Lock by-election in March was also muted. Labour’s tight control over what its candidates say is no surprise given that its backbench councillors are similarly restricted, some reading from scripts from which they cannot deviate. Others do not speak during borough council meetings or in committees; their sole responsibility is to put up their hands to vote as instructed.
Parachuting-in doesn’t only apply to Labour council candidates. There is a political parachute scandal building in the council’s overview and scrutiny committee’s housing and environment panel of which I am a member. Usually, the first meetings of the scrutiny committee and of its panels in each municipal year (which starts in May) are congenially sparky cross-party discussions about which subjects to scrutinise. Possible topics are written on sheets that are stuck on the wall with post-it notes and coloured marker pens provided for councillors to comment with a yes or a no, ticks or crosses, or more substantial comments for or against.
This year, there was no such democratic discussion. I knew something was up when I walked into the room a few minutes early to find … nothing and nobody. I’d expected a buzz of busyness with officers putting out the stationery, sticking up sheets of paper, setting the scene for a debate. The panel chairman arrived, opened the meeting then told us that the main scrutiny committee had instructed the housing and environment panel to look at land ownership in the borough.
Instructed? What? Land ownership? Why? How will that help residents living in badly-run HMOs with mice, damp and mould, filthy communal areas, appalling waste management, police raids? Or tenants of housing associations whose leadership promises action then does nothing, or bodges repairs, or gets it wrong? Various attempts were made to justify this tangential task but I wasn’t buying it. Nor were three Labour councillors, two of whom, like me, had served on this panel before and knew it could be highly effective. We put up robust arguments including that this is a task for officers talking to each other, perhaps with a bit of online searching. The chairman stood firm. Loyal, ambitious Labour councillors tried to help strengthen the case, unconvincingly. Four of us continued to challenge them. We had gone to the meeting with long lists of topics we thought ought to be scrutinised, and suggestions for getting to the bottom of failed policies. We were extremely unhappy that a topic had been parachuted-in. And the panel should not be instructed.
I objected formally to the scrutiny officer team. Back came several paragraphs of blah blah blah. I have escalated it up the organogram. It was then, as so often happens, escalated downwards. It’s been pushed back up and I expect an answer very soon. Do I think it will be positive? If it isn’t, there is another strong story to be told about the denial of democracy in Hounslow.
What happens when an HMO (house in multiple occupation) loses its licence?
It isn’t only HMOs where the front garden provides tell-tale signs of poor household management. A slew of waste, mattresses dumped, black sacks piled high – all also occur, though rarely, at other properties. It is fact, too, that not all HMOs are badly-run: some provide chic modern living behind their front doors. But when things go wrong at HMOs, life can be very grim for residents at the mercy of landlords with a don’t-care-won’t-change approach.
I’ve been supporting a couple of tenants at one appallingly-run HMO in Chiswick Gunnersbury ward, pushing for improvements including by talking to the landlord whose management style is horribly hands-off. Late this week I discovered that his HMO licence had not been renewed and, as requests for him to rectify had failed, he was to be served with the maximum fine of £30,000.
That’s quite a result. Or is it? What happens now with the tenants who continue to live in terrible conditions? Justice for Tenants provides advice to tenants of their rights and can help residents of HMOs reclaim up to a year’s rent paid while the property is unlicensed. If you know of any renters living in disrepair, or worse conditions, not only in HMOs, please encourage them to contact Justice for Tenants.
Chiswick Post Office
This remains the talk of our town with residents and business owners stopping me and asking when the post office is going to open. Actually, many more say they believe it will never re-open and that Post Office Ltd is stringing us along, waiting for a moment to tell us the door will remain shut.
I’ve been talking with the postmaster from the start and, on Wednesday, met him with Cllr Peter Thompson (leader of the Conservative group of councillors) to see how we could help him re-open its doors. The Post Office’s arguments don’t hang together. Chiswick Post Office has a huge customer base and provides an extraordinary range of services; its premises are far too large and the space needs to be reconfigured with a large area sub-let to reduce costs; the postmaster has worked hard to rebuild its former poor reputation; residents and businesses need it to re-open. We are suspicious of motives.
What is clear is that our petition has made Post Office Ltd stop and think. We don’t think its thoughts are thoughtful enough and are continuing to press them to re-open the door. The postmaster told us he could open instantly – he continues to pay his team so they are available to return as soon as the door us unlocked. We are extremely unhappy about the silence and have renewed our request for a meeting with Post Office Ltd.
If you haven’t already signed the petition, please do so. Let’s keep up the pressure together:
Cllr Joanna Biddolph, Chiswick’s postmaster Daxesh Patel, Cllr Peter Thompson
Outside the closed Chiswick Post Office
When is a planning committee decision pre-determined?
At the most recent planning committee meeting – the big item on the agenda was the controversial redevelopment of 1 Burlington Lane – two residents could not stop themselves from shouting objections from the public seats, both shocked at what appeared to be decisions that had been pre-determined. This is not allowed – yet, at the five recent call-ins through which I have supported residents, it has seemed that pre-determination exists and blatantly so.
The lawyer in attendance explained that there is a difference between pre-determined – when councillors have already made up their minds – and pre-disposed – when councillors, because of their political beliefs, are highly likely to support a particular development or policy. I find it semantically unconvincing, just as I do when a councillor – undoubtedly ideologically pre-disposed to approve an ugly, far too high-rise, aspiration-free block of shoe-box flats – says they have an open mind.
The words pre-disposition and pre-determination are interchangeable in a council where … democracy is dead.
A not so verdant Forest of e-bikes
The other talk of the town is the unexpected switch from Lime bikes to new providers Forest and Voi just when Lime seemed to be making progress to meet residents’ demands for improved geo-fencing, better management of the chaotic parking of its bikes in bays, and (arguably) fewer bikes dumped randomly at the riders’ convenience.
Thanks to a Tweet from Chiswick resident, comedian Dara O’Briain, the story made national news on the BBC website, BBC London News, ITV News, The Standard and The Guardian. The council’s response was unapologetic and pushed blame on the lack of a London-wide agreement, for which there seems to be huge support. Parents have been forced back into providing a taxi service for their kids who can no longer cycle to and from their friends in other boroughs, and workers whose commute through several boroughs must now switch providers, and pay more, mid-journey. It seems as if the decision was made by people who have their own bikes and don’t need to hire one to get from a to b or who are not skilled in joined-up thinking.
What I’d like to report is that, while waiting for the E3 bus on Friday evening, I heard a familiar if different-sounding clackety-clack, clackety-clack, clackety-clack of a hacked bike. I turned to see what I assumed would be a Lime bike, its rider working hard to push it through a hostile borough. It was a Forest bike.
A by-election and elections to come in May 2026
The result of the Cranford by-election (polling day was on Thursday 21st August) provides a useful snapshot of the local political temperature. Labour held the ward, its safest seat, but its vote was down by 1,000, more than the 951 who voted for it, and a drop of 12.6 per cent compared with its vote in 2022. We, the Conservatives came second, with 675 votes, a 10 per cent increase in vote share on 2022. Turnout was extremely low, half that of 2022.
Trust in Labour in Hounslow has plummeted.
Joanna Biddolph
Chiswick Gunnersbury ward
07976 703446
DEMOCRACY: DATES FOR YOUR DIARY 2025
Monday 13 October: Chiswick Area Forum - Normally at Hogarth Hall, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Turnham, W4 4JN, but moveable around Chiswick (please check the website). Meetings are open from 6.30pm allowing residents to meet officers of Hounslow Council in Adult and Child care Social Welfare, Education, Housing and Services
Council Meetings
Planning
Borough Council
- Tuesday 16 September 7.30pm
- Tuesday 25 November 7:30 pm
Overview and Scrutiny Panel
There is public access for these meetings via a direct lift from the ground floor to the Council Meeting Room
6th Floor, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, Hounslow TW3 3EB
Council Meetings – Overview and Scrutiny Committee
- Monday 18 September 2025 7.00pm
6th Floor, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, Hounslow TW3 3EB
Council Meetings – Audit and Governance Committee
- Tuesday 4 November 7:00 pm
6th Floor, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, Hounslow TW3 3EB
Anyone can attend public meetings of the council. Most meetings take place on the 6th Floor, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, TW3 3EB. Hounslow House is fully accessible. The nearest tube is Hounslow Central which does not have step-free access. Parking in local roads is limited.
Emergencies
You can report emergencies outside office hours by ringing the council on: 020 8583 2222.
CONSERVATIVE COUNCILLOR SURGERIES
Chiswick: Every Saturday from 9.30am to 10.30am at Chiswick Library (the seven Conservative councillors take this surgery in turn).
Gunnersbury: First Saturday of the month from 10am to 11am at The Gunnersbury Triangle Club, Triangle Way, off The Ridgeway, W3 8LU (at least one of the Chiswick Gunnersbury ward councillors takes this surgery).
CONSERVATIVE COUNCILLORS and CONTACTS
Chiswick Gunnersbury ward
Cllr Joanna Biddolph joanna.biddolph@hounslow.gov.uk 07976 703446
Cllr Ron Mushiso ron.mushiso@hounslow.gov.uk 07976 702887
Chiswick Homefields ward
Cllr Jack Emsley jack.emsley@hounslow.gov.uk 07977 396017
Cllr Gerald McGregor gerald.mcgregor@hounslow.gov.uk 07866 784821
Cllr John Todd john.todd@hounslow.gov.uk 07866 784651
Chiswick Riverside ward
Cllr Gabriella Giles gabriella.giles@hounslow.gov.uk 07966 270823
Cllr Peter Thompson peter.thompson@hounslow.gov.uk 07977 395810
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |