Controversial Burlington Lane Scheme Gets Green Light
Councillor says residents' concerns being 'assuaged in trivia'
A visualisation from the developer of how the building would loom behind St. Nicholas Church
August 8, 2025
The controversial scheme to build a ten-storey building in the heart of historic Chiswick has been given the green light by councillors on the Hounslow planning committee.
Approval was given to a residential mixed-use development including 130 flats at the junction of Burlington Lane and the Hogarth Roundabout at a meeting on the evening of Thursday 7 August.
Planning officers presented their report recommending approval for the scheme that would replace a vacant and derelict office building.
The planners concluded there were ‘low to medium levels of less than substantial harm’ to local heritage assets including St. Nicholas Church and Chiswick House.
The development is 35 metres high compared to 21 metres for the existing buildings and 25 metres for an earlier design with planning permission was described as the fall-back scheme. This had been approved by a government inspector after being refused by Hounslow Council.
It was argued by the planners that, as the two extra storeys which represented the increase in height over the fall-back scheme were glazed, there would be less impact on local views.
The project would bring in over £6million in Community Infrastructure Levy payments with around 75% going to Hounslow Council and the rest to the GLA.
Local ward councillor John Todd, who is a member of the planning committee, brought the meeting’s attention to the letter from Historic England and raised the issue of tall buildings.
He pointed out that hundreds of residents, Historic England, two local authorities and the local MP had objected to the proposal.
He said, “That anger, that frustration, that lack of being heard is being assuaged in trivia.”
CGI of the scheme as viewed from Old Chiswick Cemetery. Picture: Simpson Haugh Architects
Labour councillor Max Mosley questioned the financial viability report which included a £876,000 valuation for a 4 bed flat and the returns on this basis was used to justify the low level of affordable housing. He was informed by a planning officer said amount of affordable housing could be reviewed at a later date.
Making a 5-minute representation on behalf of the objectors, Russell Harris, a KC who specialises in planning and is President of the Old Chiswick Protection Society (OCPS), said that St. Nichola Church has had a ‘serene yet focused dominance’ of the area which was subject to a ‘historic absence of challenge’.
He disputed the characterisation by the planning officers of the views of the consultees particularly Historic England which had specifically said that the proposal presented a high level of harm.
He pointed out that the objection of Historic England was to the additional ten metres of height over the fall-back scheme and this only delivered an extra 28 flats which could not possibly be an adequate public benefit to offset the harm.
It was also pointed out that Richmond Council had objected on the basis that historical views from its side of the river had statutory protection under its Local Plan. Mr Harris said the absence of a reference to this objection in the planners’ report was inexplicable and undermined the credibility of the proposal. It was acknowledged by a planning officer later in a meeting that the report had been misleading and the objection from Richmond Council was read out in full.
CGI of scheme as viewed from Burlington Lane. Picture: Simpson Haugh Architects
When Cllr Tom Bruce said that the difference between the current and fallback proposal was one of quality not quantity and there would be no CIL payments forthcoming from the latter, he was reminded by Mr Harris that to make a decision on this basis would be unlawful.
When Cllr John Stroud Turp said that the fall-back scheme was sub-optimal and the current proposal delivered significantly more benefits, Mr Harris pointed out that the government inspector had supported the earlier scheme because the flats would deliver a very substantial contribution to need.
Following the presentation from the developer there was discussion among the committee with Cllr Bruce advocating for approval. The meeting was suspended briefly after an interruption from a member of the public. The committee proceeded to vote with 13 councillors in favour of the scheme and Cllr Todd against with an amendment proposed by Cllr Stroud Turp to limit the number of parking spaces and restrict them to EVs.
The application is now subject to approval from the Greater London Authority.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |