Broadcaster said he was responding to abuse on the One Facebook group
Jeremy Vine can often be seen in Chiswick on his penny-farthing
Some of Jeremy Vine’s Twitter activity has been deemed inconsistent with the BBC’s editorial standards following a complaint by one of the administrators of the One Chiswick Facebook group.
The complaint was made to the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) which monitors the activity of BBC employees in their personal use of social media to ensure they are adhering to the corporation’s editorial guidelines.
The complainant had alleged that Mr Vine had breached the requirement to be impartial in his posts about his cycling activity particularly with reference to traffic restrictions imposed in the Chiswick area over the last few years and Cycleway 9. They alleged that his Twitter activity represented “a campaign of abuse” against a legitimate local campaigning group.
Mr Vine’s had been responding to posts made on the One Chiswick group described by the ECU as ‘wishing him harm and describing him in opprobrious terms’ and the unit endorsed his right to do this saying his responses were not themselves abusive.
However, the ECU concluded, “In relation to impartiality, the Guidance makes clear that the BBC’s standards should be observed in personal social media activity, as well as on air, by those who work in journalism and factual programming, and the topical content of Mr Vine’s programme on Radio 2 brings him within that category. The introduction of an LTN was a source of sharp controversy in Chiswick at the time in question, (mirroring controversies in other localities where LTNs have been introduced), and was the kind of topic to which considerations of due impartiality applied for the BBC. To the extent that Mr Vine’s twitter activity since the relevant Guidance came into effect appeared to endorse one viewpoint on that topic and controvert another, it was inconsistent with the BBC’s editorial standards as they applied to him, and this aspect of the case was upheld.”
The report goes on to say the guidelines are not breached by Mr Vine being an enthusiastic proponent for cycling or highlighting its potential benefits.
The ECU reported its finding to the management of BBC Content and it was discussed with Mr Vine. It is understood no further action will be taken.
Jeremy Vine has indicated on Twitter that he will continue to post on social media in favour of LTNs and other measures such as Cycleway 9 saying, "The judgement is about comments I have made about LTNs. I understand that I am still allowed to praise cycle lanes which are different. I can certainly praise the cycle lane which runs down the end of my street.
"I'm happy to accept that I should not praise LTNs that I haven't used myself. This is helpful guidance for me."
The One Chiswick group issued a statement saying, "One Chiswick (Chiswick Residents and Businesses against Streetspace Changes) Facebook Group was set up to fight for safer streets for all and to bring back what is best about Chiswick. It is not and has never been anti-cycling.
"Since 2020 it has provided a voice to residents and businesses who wish to either oppose or critique the changes that have been made and propose alternatives on matters that affect their day to day lives and that have been imposed against the wishes of the overwhelming majority of residents. People deserve the right to free speech.
"Accordingly, OneChiswick does not endorse any abusive comments on its Facebook group, nor any attacks on cyclists."
It says that initial posts made on the group, which is private, are screened, and, if any inappropriate posts are made in response, they try to remove them as quickly as possible once they are drawn to the attention of the volunteer adminstrators. The group claims that abusive posts about him and cyclists widely shared by Jeremy Vine on social media were removed quickly once reported but were copied and shared by 'certain parties'.
The statement continues, "In re-posting them now, their intent appears to be to misrepresent OneChiswick as an abusive organisation,
some going so far as to describe the Group as posting 'constant abuse'. This is simply not true. Some of their
posts also appear to have come from other social media platforms unrelated to OneChiswick, which is further
misrepresentation. In short there appears to be a coordinated attempt to discredit OneChiswick by
misrepresenting the Facebook Group."
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact firstname.lastname@example.org and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
September 4, 2022